期刊文献+

鸦片战争前的鸦片论议新探 被引量:1

On the Opinions about Banning Opium before the Opium War
下载PDF
导出
摘要 鸦片战争前 ,鸦片论议中的例禁论不是严禁论。严禁论中存在着“重治吸食”和“严惩兴贩”的分歧。以“重治吸食”、罪以死论禁烟 ,不应受到肯定 ;“严惩兴贩”、罪以死论才是合理合情的主张。以封关绝市杜绝鸦片来源的思想和决策是不合时宜的 ;而弛种土烟与弛禁论则同是想发毒品财。禁鸦片的关键在于打击鸦片贩卖 ,而不在于断绝对外开放通商。相反 ,大力发展对外贸易通商才是杜漏银。 Before the Opium War the banning of opium s moking and trade was not st rict. There were two different viewpoints in the strict banning. One was to puni sh the smokers severely, and the other was to punish the traders severely. It is clear that to sentence the traders to death was surely more reasonable than to sentence the smokes to death. It was not proper to try to ban opium trade by sto pping border trade. To loosen the ban and permit peasants to grow opium in China was aimed at reaping unfair profits. The key to opium banning was to forbid opi um trade, instead of banning foreign trade as a whole. To promote foreign trade was the best way to enrich the country.
作者 郑剑顺
机构地区 厦门大学历史系
出处 《厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期142-148,共7页 Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)
关键词 鸦片 驰禁论 例禁论 严禁论 鸦片战争 opium, theory of slacken-the-banning, theor y of conventional banning. Theory of strict banning, stopping the foreign trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1中国史学会.中国近代史资料丛刊:鸦片战争(一)[Z].上海:上海人民出版社,1962.
  • 2筹办夷务始末(道光朝):卷一[Z].北京:中华书局,1964.
  • 3包世臣.包世臣全集[M].合肥:黄山书社,1997.
  • 4龚自珍.送钦差大臣侯官林公序[A].龚自珍全集[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1975.
  • 5林则徐.林则徐集·奏稿:中册[Z].北京:中华书局,1965.
  • 6梁廷(木丹).夷氛闻记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 7魏源.魏源集:上册[M].北京:中华书局,1983.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部