1[1]Bhal PS, Pugh ND, Chui DK, et al. The use of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate the relationship between perifollicular vascularity and outcome in in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Hum Reprod,1999,14:939-945.
2[2]Coroleu B, Carreras O. Veiga A, et al. Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod,2000,15:616-620.
3[3]Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, et al. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update,1996,2:323-335.
4[4]Ng EHY, Tang OS, Ho PC. The significance of the number of antral follicles prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian responses in an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod,2000,(in press).
5[5]Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pitroff R, et al. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization programme. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,1995,6:191-198.
6[6]Wikland M, Borg J, Hamberger L, et al. Simplification of IVF: minimal monitoring and the use of subcutaneous purified FSH administration for ovulation induction. Hum Reprod,1994,9:1430-1436.
7Hov Y, Hoynsteine. Diagnostic Laparoscopy in primary and secondary inferility. [ J ] Assist Repprt Gent,2003 ;20 (9) :561 - 566.
8Sbale J, Meiziler I, Bar Hava I, et al. Predictive value of transvaginal Sonography penfomed be- fore routine diabnostic hysterosopy for evaluation of infertility [ J ]. Fertil Steril, 2000 ; 73 ( 2 ) : 412 -417.
9lerviel P, Lergai J L, Sananer S, et al. Role of Hystemscop Y in the disagnosis and tfeatment of infertilitiy [ J ]. Pressmed, 2000 ; 29 ( 231 ) : 1302 - 1310.
10Mencaglia L. Endoscopic suf9eTy and disgnosis in infertility management and assisted reproduc- tion techniques [ J ]. Gynaecol Endosc, 2000; 9 (1) :9 - 17.
