摘要
教材最主要的质量 ,一是正确 ,二是简明。对于注释 ,无需一一注明“王力或其他前人已说 ,我是采用”。批评者所谓的六种“抄袭”方法 ,是不合实际的。以《左传·郑伯克段于鄢》中的几处注释为例 ,荆书注释有比前贤改进增色的地方。对吕、王第二篇评荆文章中所谓的荆书“无知妄改”
The success of textbooks in basic quality lies in both correctness and brevity.It is comptelely unnecessary for the author to note that “Wang Li and the other predecessors have already said.”The two critics'six so-called “plagiarisms” are unreal and unexistent.This essay,taking the passage “Zheng Bo defeated Duan at Yan”(Zuo zhuan) for example,explains that Jing's book has many improvements,which are much better than his predecessors.The essay has raised six queries to Lü and Wang's point of view that Mr Jing is “ignorant” and his book is full of “falsification”.
出处
《商丘师范学院学报》
CAS
2001年第3期93-95,共3页
Journal of Shangqiu Normal University