摘要
萨特和加缪都是存在主义大师。世界是荒诞的 ,是他们共同的哲学观。但由于他们对荒诞的具体看法不尽相同。因而面对荒诞他们的拯救之途也不同。加缪对之以“反抗” ,萨特却对之以“自由选择”。本文着重从哲学和文学创作上分析他们的分歧之处。
Satre and Camus were both masters of existism.They shared the same philosophical view that the world was absurd.But they were different in seeing the absurd details.Therefore,they suggested different ways to get rid of the absurdness.Camus prefered “resistance', while Satre liked “free choice'. This paper is to analyse their differences in philosophy and literature.
出处
《赣南师范学院学报》
2001年第2期20-23,共4页
Journal of Gannan Teachers' College(Social Science(2))