期刊文献+

浅论宋诗“以学问为诗”的形成过程 被引量:4

COMMENTS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE IDEAL OF "LEARNING THAT IS POETRY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学问一直为历代诗人所重视,“以学问为诗”却是在宋代形成的,其源头可以追溯到唐代诗人杜甫。杜甫首先以赋笔写诗和以议论入诗,从而打破了中国诗歌传统的审美体系,开始关注诗歌中的学问典故、字词韵律。韩愈、李商隐为唐人学杜诗最有成就的两位诗人,他们的创作、诗学观直接影响了宋诗“以学问为诗”的形成。“以学问为诗”便在西昆派(以典故为诗)、欧阳修(化用古人诗句)、王安石(以史料入诗)等诗人努力下,到苏轼、黄庭坚达到成熟。特别是黄庭坚的诗学理论的提出,从而使“以学问为诗”从一种单纯的诗歌技巧上升为诗歌创作观。 Poets of generations before the Song Dynasty had attached great importance to learning. It was, however, in the Song Dynasty that the fashion of 'learning that is poetry'was formed, the source of which can be dated back to Dufu, a famous poet in the Tang Dynasty. Dufu began with inditing the poems interspersed with his argumentation, thus breaking with the traditional aesthetic system of the Chinese poetry and becoming the first to pay close attention to learning and literary quotations as well as the rhyme of the individual Chinese characters and phrases. Two poets that were indebted to Du and his poetry were Han Yu and Li Shangyin, whose creative works and theory of poetry had exerted a direct influence on the shaping of the ideal of 'learning that is poetry'. Enhanced by the efforts of the Xikun school, whose poetry was grounded on the literary allusions,of Ouyangxiu, who sought to improve his poetry from the ancients, and of Wang Anshi, whose poetry was composed out of the historical materials, the ideal of 'learning that is poetry' gradually culminated in maturity when it was taken over by Sushi and Huang Tingjian. The latter's contribution to this ideal particularly deserves to be mentioned . It is no exaggeration to say that, thanks to Huang Tingjian's theory on poetics, the ideal of 'learning that is poetry' ascended upward from a pure poetic technique to a theoretical height of poetry creation.
作者 罗山鸿
出处 《上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2001年第3期80-84,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 宋代 诗歌 史料 西昆派 "学问" 典故 形成过程 杜甫 李商隐 欧阳修 诗觉观 the Song Dynasty, learning, allusions, shaping
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[1]王水照.宋代文学通论[M].河南:河南大学出版社.
  • 2[2]许总.宋诗史[M].重庆:重庆出版社.
  • 3[3]木斋.宋诗评译[M].广西:广西师范大学出版社.
  • 4[4]黄宝华.黄庭坚评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社.
  • 5[6]程千帆,吴新雷.两宋文学[M],上海:上海古籍出版社.
  • 6[7]朱靖华.苏轼论[M].北京:京华出版社.

同被引文献23

  • 1周裕锴.宋代《演雅》诗研究[J].文学遗产,2005(3):38-50. 被引量:13
  • 2魏中林.古典诗学的学问化问题与清诗研究[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,21(3):53-56. 被引量:3
  • 3刘苏周,袁晓军.英汉诗歌互译中意象的处理[J].玉林师范学院学报,2006,27(2):67-69. 被引量:7
  • 4清·何文焕.历代诗话(上册)[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • 5程颢,程颐.《二程集》(第一册),北京:中华书局,1981年,第120页.
  • 6梁坤.外国文学名著选读[M]中国人民大学出版社,2002.
  • 7唐·韩愈,马其昶,马茂元.韩愈文集校注[M].上海古籍出版社,1986.365;1;4.
  • 8清·阮元.扬州隋文选楼记[C].丛书集成初编?揅经室二集(卷二)[C].中华书局,1985.365.
  • 9季镇淮.韩愈《师说》的思想和写作背景[J].语文学习,1959,(9):16.
  • 10钱钟书.谈艺录[M].生活、读书、新知三联书店,2007.107;3;2.

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部