摘要
文章认为老子的“道”的内涵有三种含义,而程颐以其中的一种“空无”义解老子的也是道家的道.程颐认为万物的本源和本体并非空无而是客观实存的天理.程颐的天理论虽然和道家在“道”的基本内涵上迥然有别,但它又大量吸摄了道家的本体论、本源论、规律论及自然论中所蕴的思辨哲理.
The paper dwells on the three meanings of Lao Zi's Taoism, among which only 'emptiness' was accepted by Cheng Yi, who insisted that noumenon and origin of universe was not emptiness but the objective 'principle of heaven'. Although Cheng Yi's Taoism was very different from that of the Taoism, his theory of 'the Priciple of Heaven' absorbed a great deal of thinking indicated in the ontology, the theory of origin and the natural theory of Taoism.
出处
《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》
2001年第2期78-82,共5页
Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition