期刊文献+

20世纪西方大众政治对国家对外政策和外交的影响 被引量:7

The Influences of Mass Politics upon Foreign Policy and Diplomacy of the Western Countries in the 20th Century
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪里 ,西方大众政治对西方国家对外政策的形成方式和外交操作方式始终有着广泛、深入的重大影响。无论在自由民主制国家 ,还是在法西斯极权国家 ,大众政治都是决定外交和战略的主要因素之一 ,因而也是决定国际政治及其变迁的主要因素之一 ,尽管它在这两类不同国家的存在形式和作用形态很不相同。在大众政治引起的“外交革命”之外 ,对外政策的一项新手段———国际宣传以及在 2 0世纪尤为盛行的国际颠覆 ,也与大众政治密切相关。然而 ,不能忽视在自由民主制国家 ,政府和公众舆论的关系还包括前者往往影响和操纵后者 ,而“外交革命”在其消极意义之外还有其积极意义。 There had been, throughout the 20th century,widespread and profound influences of mass politics upon foreign policy making and operation of diplomacy in the Western countries. Whether in the liberal democracies or in the Nazi and Fascist totalitarian states, mass politics was without exception one of the major determinants of not only diplomacy and strategy, but also international politics and its transformation, although its forms of existence and ways of operation were quite different in these two kinds of states. Besides the “diplomatic revolution' brought into being by mass politics, international propaganda as a new instrument of foreign policy and international subversion which was particularly prevalent in the 20th century were also closely related to mass politics. However, it should not be ignored that the relationship between government and public opinion in the liberal democracies included also the former's influence upon and manipulation of the latter, and that the “diplomatic revolution”had its positive significances in addition to the negative ones.
作者 时殷弘
出处 《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期143-151,共9页 Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 大众政治 对外政策 宣言式外交 外交操作方式 国际政治 西方国家 大众情绪 大众舆论 mass politics foreign policy making operation of diplomacy “diplomatic revolution' international politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Geoffrey Barraclough. An Introduction to Contemporary History [ M ]. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books,1967.
  • 2K. J. Holsti. International Politics: A Framework for Analysis [M], Englewood, Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, 1977.
  • 3时殷弘.现代大众政治的兴起与其欧洲国际政治效应[J].史学月刊,2000(2):90-95. 被引量:5
  • 4Ceorge F. Kennan. The Decline of Bismark's Euxopean Order [M] .Princeton, N. J: Princeton University Press, 1979.
  • 5Gordon A. Craig, Alexander George. Force and Statecraft : Diplomatic Problems of Our Time [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  • 6Gordon A.Craig, Felox Gilbert,Introduction[A]. The Diplomats ,1919-1939 [Z], New York: Atheneum, 1963.
  • 7Harold Nicolson. The Evolution of Diplomacy[M] New York: Collier Books, 1962.
  • 8Ian Clark. The Hierarchy of States : Reform and Resistance in the Intrnational Order [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
  • 9James N. Rosenau. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy [M]. New York: Random House, 1961.
  • 10Dexter Perkins. The Depamnent of State and American Public Opinion[A]. Cordon AlCraig, Felox Gilbert. The Diplomats ,1919 - 1939 [Z] .New York: Atheneum, 1963.

二级参考文献33

  • 1时殷弘.《民族主义与国家增生及伦理道德思考》[A].资中筠主编.《国际政治理论探索在中国》[C].上海人民出版社,1998年.第36页.
  • 2“自相矛盾的是,关于国际秩序的种种理论既有过多地集中于国家的毛病,又有对国家演化着的性质阐析过少的弊端。”IanClark,TheHierarchyofStatse:ReformandResistanceintheInternationalOrder.Cambridge,1989,p.212。
  • 3K.J.Holsti,InternationalPolitics:AFrameworkforAnalysis,3rdEdition,EnglewoodCliffs,N.J.,1977,p.218.
  • 4指一定时间内流行于一国国民中间的非常笼统的对外态度或倾向,例如19世纪和20世纪初美国国民中占主流的对欧孤立主义。详见Ibid.,pp.394—395。
  • 5GordonA.CraigandAlexanderL.George,ForceandStatecraft.3rdEdition,Oxford,1995,pp.20,29.
  • 6Ibid.,p.29.
  • 7DavidArmstrong,RevolutionandWorldOrder:TheRevolutionaryStateinInternationalSociety.Oxford,1993,p.248.
  • 8HaroldNicolson,TheEvolutionofDiplomacy.NewYork,1962,pp.102-107.“经典外交”问世于路易十四时期的法国,而其最后的系统的遗存可以说也在法国,亦即以德尔卡塞为主要执掌者的19、20世纪之交的法国外交。详见Ibid.,chapter3;FelixGilbert,TheEndoftheEuropeanEra,1890tothePresent.2ndEdition,NewYork,1979,pp.67,107.
  • 9GeoffreyBarraclough,AnIntroductiontoContemporaryHistory.Harmondsworth,Middlesex,1967,pp.124—126.参见MarkR.Brawley,LiberalLeadership:GreatPowersandTheirChallengersinPeaceandWar.Ithaca,N.Y.,1993,p.38.
  • 10它将由于全体成年女性逐渐取得参政权利而进一步发展为较完全的自由民主制。当然,它就19至20世纪初的德国来说,多半只是形式的,而且是在残缺不全的形式上。

共引文献11

同被引文献91

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部