期刊文献+

肾癌组织中微血管密度检测及其临床意义 被引量:3

Microvessel density determination in renal cell carcinoma and its significance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨肾癌微血管密度 (MVD)与其组织学类型、肿瘤分级及转移之间的关系 ;评价MVD对肾癌预后估价的意义。方法 :应用Ⅷ因子相关抗原 (FⅧ -RAg)单克隆抗体进行免疫组化SABC法染色 ,检测 49例原发性肾癌根治性切除术标本中MVD。结果 :49例肾癌组织中平均MVD为 5 8 6 2± 2 3 86 ,明显高于正常肾组织 (P <0 0 1)。MVD与其局部淋巴结转移无相关性 (P <0 0 5 ) ,而与肾癌的分级及远处转移呈正相关 (P <0 0 1) ,与 5年生存期呈负相关 (P <0 0 1)。结论 :肾癌组织中MVD与其组织学类型、肿瘤分级、远处转移及生存期均密切相关 ,检测肿瘤组织中MVD可作为估介肾癌预后的一项重要指标。 Objective:To investigate the relationship of MVD(microvessel density)in renal cell carcinoma to histological type,tumor grade,metastasis,and to evaluate the prognostic significance of MVD in renal cell carcinoma.Methods:Specimens were taken from 49 patients with primary renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy.MVD was evaluated immunohistochemically using the labeled streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method with a monoclonal antibody directed against factor Ⅷ-related antigen(F Ⅷ-RAg).Results:The mean MVD of 49 cases in renal cell carcinoma was 58.62±23.86,and was significanly higher than that in the normal renal tissue( P <0.01).MVD did not correlate with metastasis to local lymph node( P <0.05);however,MVD was positively correlated to tumor grade and distant metastasis( P <0.01),but negatively correlated to 5 year survival( P <0.01).Conclusion:It suggests that MVD in renal cell carcinoma is significantly correlated to histologial type,tumor grade,distant metastasis and survival.Assessment of tumor MVD is probably one of the most important prognostic feature in renal cell carcinoma.
出处 《武警医学院学报》 CAS 2001年第2期109-111,共3页 Acta Academiae Medicinae CPAPF
关键词 肾肿瘤 肿瘤血管组织 免疫组织化学 微血管密度 MVD Kidney Carcinoma Neoplasm vascularity Immunohistochemistry
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1孟晓,管淑萍.肿瘤微血管研究进展[J].医学信息(云南),1998,11(4):41-43. 被引量:3
  • 2Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K. Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell carcinoma [J]. Int J Urol, 1995, 2 (3) 156-160.
  • 3Maclennan GT, Bostwick DG. Microvessel density in renal cell carcinomal: lack of prognostic significance [ J ]. Urology,1995, 46 (1): 27-30.
  • 4Weidner I, Semole JP, Welch WR, et al. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis - correlation in invasive breast carcinoma[J]. NEngl J Med, 1991, 32 (4): 1-2.
  • 5蔡松良.肿瘤血管性研究的现状及临床应用[J].中华实验外科杂志,1988,6(3):142-144.
  • 6陶厚权.肿瘤内微血管密度是恶性肿瘤的一个预后因素[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,1996,10(2):73-75. 被引量:13
  • 7聂旭光,季延安.肿瘤血管生成[J].医学综述,1997,3(10):469-471. 被引量:6
  • 8Syviasta A, Laidler P, Davies R, et al. The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate - thickness skin melanoma [J]. Am JPathol, 1988, 133: 419-423.
  • 9耿敬姝,鄢明明,程慧,孙迷离.肾细胞癌组织内血管分布的形态及定量研究[J].实用肿瘤学杂志,1996,10(4):59-62. 被引量:4

二级参考文献1

  • 1Donald R. Senger,Livingston Water,Lawrence F. Brown,Janice A. Nagy,Kiang-Teck Yeo,Tet-Kin Yeo,Brygida Berse,Robert W. Jackman,Ann M. Dvorak,Harold F. Dvorak. Vascular permeability factor (VPF, VEGF) in tumor biology[J] 1993,Cancer and Metastasis Reviews(3-4):303~324

共引文献19

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部