期刊文献+

浅析一种新的国际工程指标报价策略──机会与风险评估 被引量:1

On A New Tender Strategy--Opportunity& Risk Assessmet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的投标报价策略主要是在了解并分析竟争对手以往的投标报价利润率和中标概率基础上调整已方的报价,以求中标。但如果无法获得竞争对手刻意保密的商业秘密,上述策略也就没有任何实用意义了。机会与风险评估策略则是在研究工程现场和标书的基础上,寻找和分析某些对工程可能有利或不利的因素,并对这些因素作量化分析,折算成标价,以对正常标价进行调整,从而使报价更科学,也更具竞争性。这种报价策略目前在国际大型跨国工程公司中的应用日益普及。因此,将其介绍到国内来,毫无疑问将是非常有益的。 How to adjust the tender price of itself to win tea tender on the basis of knowing and analyzing the former tender profit margin and the tender-winning probability of the competitors is the core of traditional tender strategy. There is no point to do in this way because the information above said shall not be collected and acquired by the competitors easily. The strategy of 'Tender Opportunity & Risk Assessment' (hereinafter called TORA) means that it may be used by the tenderer to find out and analyze the favorable or unfavorable factors (the favorables are called opportunities and the unfavorables called risks) existing in the tender documents or in the project itself the foundation of poring over the project sites, its environment and tender documents, which shall be quantized by analysis and converted into tender price for adjustment of the final price. TORA at present is under populariztion and being and used by some large sized transnational contractors. Intro- ducing this tender skill to our readers shall be very helpful.
作者 史啸虎
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2001年第3期121-125,共5页 Science Research Management
关键词 工程报价 机会 风险 评估 国际工程 投标报价 Construction Tendering Opportunity Risk Assessment.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

  • 1方德英,李敏强,寇纪淞.软件项目风险管理方法的比较与分析[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(3):81-85. 被引量:11
  • 2张金隆,谢刚,卢新元.一种基于VPRS的IT项目投标风险要素评价方法[J].管理学报,2004,1(2):192-194. 被引量:9
  • 3梁成柱,高晓峰.项目施工中的风险及规避对策[J].石家庄铁路工程职业技术学院学报,2004,3(2):66-69. 被引量:2
  • 4Lyytinen K. Expectation failure concept and system analysts'view of information system failures: results of an exploratory study[J]. Information and Management, 1988, 14: 45 -:56.
  • 5Nidumolu S. A comparison of the structural contingency and risk - based perspectives on coordination in software - development projects[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems 1996,13:77 -113.
  • 6Leopoulos V. , Kirytopoulos K. , Malandrakis C. An applicable methodology for strategic risk management during the bidding process [J]. Int. J, Risk Assessment and Management,2003, 4 : 67 - 80.
  • 7Kitchenham B., Pickard L, M., Linkman S., Jones P.W. Modeling Software Bidding Risks [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2003, 29(6) : 542-554.
  • 8Ward S. C. , Chapman C. B. Developing competitive bids: a framework for information processing [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1988, 39:123-34.
  • 9Boehm B. W. Software risk management: Principles and practices [J]. IEEE Software, 1991, 8(1):32 -41.
  • 10师汉民.面向产品全生命周期的设计[J].中国机械工程,1998,9(12):1-2. 被引量:13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部