4Pengo V, Barbero F, Biasiolo A, et al. Prevention of throm- boembolism in patients with mitral stenosis and associated atrial fibrillation: effectiveness of low intensity (INR target 2) oral anticoagulant treatment[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2003, 89(4) : 760-764.
5Singer DE, Fang MC, Go AS. The international normalized ratio range of 2. 0 to 3. 0 remains appropriate for atrial fibrillation[J].Arch Intern Med, 2009, 169(21): 2032.
6Lane DA, Lip GY. Anticoagulation intensity for elderly atrial fibrillation patients: should we use a conventional INR target (2.0 to 3. 0) or a lower range? [J].Thromb Haemost, 2010, 1113(2) 254 -256.
7Kawata M, Takamoto S. Protection of the central nervous system during thoracic aortic surgery [J]. Masui, 2007, 56(3) 271-279.
8Numata S, Thomson DS, Seah P, et al. Simplified cerebral protection using unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest[J].Heart Lung Circ, 2009, 18(5): 334 -336.
9Ruel M, Masters RG, Rubens FD, et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aotic and mitral valve replacement[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004,78( 1 ) 77 -84.
10Murphy GS, Hessel EA 2nd, Groom RC.Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: an evidence based approach [J]. Anesth Analg, 2009, 108(5): 1394-1417.
