期刊文献+

语言能力天赋论与建构论 被引量:2

On the Innatism and the Constructionism of Linguistic Capacity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 乔姆斯基和皮亚杰分别建立了语言能力的天赋论与建构论 ,两者的冲突体现了历史发展的辩证过程。语言能力以先天的生理素质为基础 ,在与环境的相互作用中不断地积极建构而形成。语言能力天赋论与建构论之争反映了历史上唯物主义和唯心主义两大方法论的斗争 ,这种争论不仅使语言学作为一门学科更加向科学化的方向迈进 。 Noam Chomsky and Jean Piaget separately formed the innatism and the constructionism of linguistic capacity, and their disputes presented a dialectical process of history in the development of linguistics. Linguistic capacity is actively constructed through the interaction between the individual and his environment on the basis of the inbred biological devices. The dispute between the constructionism and the innatism of linguistic capacity reflects a dispute between the materialistic and the idealistic methodology, thus enhances the scientization of linguistics, shedding light on linguistic research and foreign language teaching.
作者 艾朝阳
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2001年第2期65-69,共5页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词 语言能力 天赋论 建构论 外语教学 linguistic capacity innatism constructionism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax[M]. Cambridge : MIT Press, 1965.
  • 2Chomsky,N. Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace &World[M]. Inc. 1968.
  • 3Geoffrey Sampson. Schools of Linguistics. London: Hutchinson & Co[M]. Ltd. 1980.
  • 4Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini. Language and Learning The Debate between Jean Piaget and Norm Chomsky [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1980.
  • 5艾朝阳.环境唯象中医学学说[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,1997,:91-93.
  • 6皮亚杰.心理学与认识论[M].北京:求实出版社,1988.
  • 7皮亚杰.发生认识论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
  • 8皮亚杰 倪连生.结构主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984,11..
  • 9皮亚杰.生物学与认识论[M].北京:三联出版社,1989.
  • 10皮亚杰.儿童的心理发展[M].济南:山东教育出版社,1984.

二级参考文献8

  • 1刘润清,《西方语言学流派》[M],北京,外语教学与研究出版社,1999.
  • 2Carston, R. 2000. The relalionship between genewative grammar and (relevance theoretic) pragmaties. The Relevance Homepage. University College London.
  • 3Chomaky, N. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. London: Fontana.
  • 4Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 5Lyon. J. 1977. Chomsky. London: Fontana.
  • 6Radford A. 1981. Transformational Syntas: A student's guide to Chomsky 's Ertended Stamlard Theory. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Sperber.D. and Wilson, D. 1986, 1995. Relevance: Coummnication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 8Stemmer, B. 1999, An on line interview with Noam Chomsky: on the nature of Prgmaties and related issues. Brain and Language, Vol.68, No,3. pp, 393-101.

共引文献91

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部