论间接侵犯商业秘密罪的主观方面

On the Subjective Aspect of Infringement on Commercial Secret

间接侵犯商业秘密罪的主观方面为“明知或者应知”,根据词义理解 ,应包括故意和过失 ,但将“应知”理解为过失显然有不合理之处 ,对此学者也有不同观点。本文通过对立法本意的揣测和对“应知”的深层理解 ,主张应对“应知”作合理解释 。

The subjective of aspect on the infringement of commercial refersto is'knowing perfectly well 'or 'should know' According to the interpretation of the works ,it should contains 'intention' and 'negligence',There's something illogic if'should know'is interpreted as 'negligence',and scholars'opinions differ.in this With the deliberation of the original meaning of the legislation,and the deep understanding of 'should know',the author argues that'should know'should be interpreted properly,excluding negligence.