行政强制手段模式的比较与反思

A Comparison of and Reflections on the Patterns of Administrative Enforcement Measures

无论是英美等国把刑罚和行政处罚作为行政强制执行的手段 ,还是日本以代执行为核心、以行政上的制裁等其他手段为补充的多样化强制手段 ,都反映了人权保障的基本理念 ,即从人权保障的基本理念出发 ,尽量抑制直接强制手段的适用 ,循着间接强制的思路但又跳出传统的间接强制模式去寻求其他丰富多彩的强制手段 ,以更好地实现预期的行政目标。这一思路值得我国在设计行政强制手段模式时借鉴。

In the UK and the US punishment and administrative penalty are administered as a means of administrative enforcement, and in Japan other enforcement measures are taken. All these practices reflect people's understanding of the protection of human rights. In the author's opinion, from the basic idea of safeguarding human rights it is necessary to restrain the use of direct enforcement measures. Instead using indirect enforcement measures to achieve the expected administrative objectives seems to be a better alternative. This view is worth considering when administrative enforcement measures are designed in China.