期刊文献+

船舶扣押的法律思考——兼评我国《海事诉讼特别程序法》的有关规定 被引量:8

Some Legal Consideration of the Seizure of Ships——On some relevant articles in "Special Procedure of Admiralty Proceedings" in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 船舶扣押在英美法系与大陆法系定性不同 ,195 2年《统一有关扣押海运船舶的若干规定的国际公约》在一定范围内规范了国际船舶扣押制度。立足于对有关国家和国际公约的考察 ,我国船舶扣押制度的价值取向是应以建立担保为目标 。 The nature of seizing a ship is determined differently in British and American Laws and in Chinese Laws. 'The International Treaty for Certain Regulations to Seize the Ships on the Sea' drawn up in 1952 defines to a certain extent the proceedings to seize international ships. Based on a study of the practice in the relevant countries and of the International Treaty, the regulations for the seizure of ships in our country should involve in the orientation to form a system with warranty as its base. The court of the country where the ship is seized cannot exercise an all round power in the case. Instead, its jurisdiction should be limited to a certain extent.
作者 谭岳奇
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2001年第6期43-51,共9页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 船舶扣押 国际公约 价值取向 管辖权 法律 中国 《海事诉讼特别程序法》 the seizure of ships International Treaty orientation jurisdiction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[1]沈达明.比较民事诉讼初论(下册)[M].中信出版社,1991.P191.
  • 2[2]Lawrence C. Provisional and Protective Measures in International Litigation. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, 1992. P48~53.
  • 3[4]Catherine K. Note on Provisional and Protective in private International Law and Comparative Law,P24- 33.
  • 4沈达明.仲裁庭与保全程序[J].仲裁与法律通讯,1995,(2).
  • 5[6]中国海商法年刊[M].大连:大连海运大学出版社,1991.P394.

同被引文献45

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部