摘要
目的 评价呼吸机、气管导管等器械阻力导致的附加功 (WOBimp)对患者呼吸功 (WOBp)的影响。方法 通过Ventrak 15 5 0呼吸监测仪 ,测定 18例患者不同机械通气条件下WOBp和WOBimp的变化。结果 持续气道正压 (CPAP) 5cmH2 O时 ,WOBp为 (10 14± 3 46 )J/min ,分别比压力支持通气 (PSV) 5cmH2 O和T管高 48 5 % (P <0 0 5 )和 2 3 7% (P >0 0 5 ) ,但比CPAP 0cmH2 O低 7 2 % (P >0 0 5 )。CPAP 5、 0cmH2 O和T管时 ,WOBimp占WOBp的比例分别为 5 8%、 5 1%和 42 %。CPAP 5cmH2 O时 ,WOBimp为 (0 78± 0 2 4)J/L ,分别比PSV 5cmH2 O〔(0 34± 0 13)J/L〕和T管〔(0 5 3± 0 14)J/L〕高 48 5 % (P <0 0 5 )和 2 3 7%(P <0 0 5 )。结论 呼吸机及气管导管导致的WOBimp使WOBp明显增加 。
Objective To evaluate the effect of imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) caused by apparatus (endotracheal tube,ventilator tube and valve) on the patients work of breathing (WOBp).Methods Eighteen patients with mechanical ventilation were observed.WOBp and WOBimp were measured by Ventrak 1550 pulmonary monitor.Results While breathing at pressure support(PSV) 5 cm H 2O,T-piece and continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) 0 cm H 2O,the WOBp were 48 5%(P<0 05) and 23 7%(P>0 05) less,and 7 2%(P>0 05) greater than the WOBp at CPAP 5 cm H 2O respectively.The WOBimp contributed to 58%,51% and 42% of the WOBp at CPAP 5,0 cm H 2O,and T-piece.WOBimp at CPAP 5 cm H 2O〔(0 78±0 24)J/L〕 was 48 5% and 23 7% greater than WOBimp at PSV 5 cm H 2O〔(0 34±0 13)J/L,P<0 05〕 and T-piece〔(0 53±0 14)J/L,P<0 05〕 respectively.Conclusion WOBimp caused by apparatus could markedly increase WOBp,and the endotracheal tube is the major cause of WOBimp. [
出处
《中华急诊医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2001年第4期235-237,共3页
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine