“鼎足对”与“三柱联”比较论略

A Comparative Study of the "Tripod Antithetical couplets" and the "Antithetical Triplets to Be Put Up on Three Pillars

从对偶语言的外部形态、内部结构 ,及其适用范围等方面比较研究鼎足对与三柱联的异同。结果表明 :二者虽然在对偶语言出现的句数上相同 ,但鼎足对始终是修辞意义上的形式 ,不具有对联的本质特征 ,三柱联则具有独立的文学品格和审美功能 。

A Comparative study of the difference and similarities between the tripod antithetical couplets and the triplets to be put up on three pillars from the external forms, the internal structures and the scope of application of the antithetical language shows that, in form, they couplet consist of the same number of lines, but the tripod couplet is always a rhetorical form without the essential features of antithetical couplets. The antithetical triplets have their independent literary qualities and aesthetic functions. In essence the two forms are not identical.