期刊文献+

单支开放冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和疗效评价 被引量:1

Interventional therapy of multivessel disease with single patency coronary artery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 观察单支开放冠状动脉介入治疗的即刻效果和远期疗效。方法 回顾性分析1989年 9月至 2 0 0 1年 5月 43例未能做冠状动脉搭桥术的单支开放冠状动脉患者进行介入治疗的即刻效果 ,以及随访一年以上的心血管事件发生率和心功能。结果  43例患者中 40例成功地进行了冠状动脉球囊扩张术或支架植入术 ,近期症状明显缓解 ;住院期间 2例发生急性心肌梗死 ,1例猝死 ,均为血管急性闭塞所致。 34例患者随访 1年以上 ,其中长期症状缓解 2 4例 ,再发心绞痛 8例 ,心肌梗死 1例 ,心功能恶化 1例 (PTCA未成功者 ) ;冠脉造影证实再狭窄 8例 ,新病变 1例 ,2例行冠状动脉搭桥术 ,5例重复PTCA ,1例行激光心肌打孔术。结论 对于不能进行冠状动脉搭桥术的单支冠脉开放患者 ,介入治疗可以改善症状 ,保护心脏功能。 Objective To evaluate the safety and effect of interventional therapy in patients with single patency coronary artery, who cannot treated by CABG Methods Retrospectively analyze the hospital effect and complication of PTCA or stenting in these patients, and followed up more than one year to record cardiac events and heart function Results 43 patients were analyzed One or more vessels of 40 patients were successfully revascularized Two cases of AMI and one case of death happened in hospital because of acute occlusion after PTCA, which were all happened before stent used 34 patients were followed up more than one year 24 patients had no symptom There were 8 cases of angina pectoris and one case of AMI during the period of follow up, 9 restenosis and 1 new lesion were confirmed by angiography The heart function of only one patient went worse, who had a failed PTCA, and CABG could not be made because of other disease Conclusion Interventional therapy is effective on relieving symptom and protecting heart function in patients with single patency coronary artery who cannot undergo CABG, but the rate of complication and restenosis is high
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2001年第B12期61-63,共3页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 冠心病 多支病变 单支开放冠状动脉 介入治疗 Coronary heart disease Multivessel disease Single patency artery Interventional therapy
  • 相关文献

同被引文献6

  • 1The Writing Group for the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularisation Investigation(BARI) Lavestigators Five-Year clinical and functional outcurve comparing bypass surgery and angioplasty in patients with multovessel coronary diseaae a multicoated randomized trial. JAMA, 1997, 277:715--21.
  • 2Small RS, Holmes DR, Vlieststra RE, et al. Comparison of complete revisualization by coronary for unstable angina.J Intervent Cardiol, 1998, 1: 11--3.
  • 3King SB, Kosinski AS, Guyton RA, et al. Eight-year mortality in the Emory angioplasty versus surgery trial(EAST) .J Am Coil Cardiol, 2000, 35:1116-- 8.
  • 4Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Richards AF, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing coronary angioplaaty with bypass surgery. Lancet, 1995, 346:1184--6.
  • 5陈纪林,高润霖,蔡强军,杨跃进,乔树宾,秦学文,张峻,姚民.经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术及置入支架的长期预后分析[J].中华心血管病杂志,2001,29(1):2-4. 被引量:53
  • 6王东亚.冠状动脉复杂病变的介入治疗策略[J].解放军保健医学杂志,2002,4(1):15-17. 被引量:2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部