摘要
①目的 比较体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移置术后房颤的发生率。②方法 10 2例病人随机分为 3组 ,分别行非体外循环微创冠状动脉旁路移置术 ,温氧合血和冷氧合血心脏停搏液冠状动脉旁路移置术。③结果 不停搏组、温血停搏组、冷血停搏组的房颤发生率分别为 2 5 .7% (9/35 ) ,2 8.1% (9/32 ) ,2 8.6 % (10 /35 ) ,差异无显著性 (χ2 =0 .0 87,P >0 .0 5 )。
Objective To performe a retrospective study comparing the incidence of atrial fibrillation in 3 groups of patients revascularized with and without extracorporeal circulation. \ Methods 102 patients were randomly divided into three groups:off-pump coronary artery bypass , warm blood cardioplegia solution group and cold blood cardioplegia solution group. Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of atrial fibrillation in the three groups(χ 2=0.087,P>0.05 ). Conclusion The postoperative atrial fibrillation can not be interpreted from extracorporeal circulation and different methods of anyocardial protection.
出处
《齐鲁医学杂志》
2001年第2期109-110,共2页
Medical Journal of Qilu
