期刊文献+

对墨西哥水政策变迁的考察 被引量:2

Review of Vicissitude of Mexico'sWater Policies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 墨西哥是缺水的国家。 2 0世纪 90年代前的三项核心政策是 :( 1 )增加政府投资 ;( 2 )改进水事工程技术 ;( 3 )加强保护水资源有关的社会意识。但是 ,90年代后水政策调整的理念是 :水这样的自然资源 ,财产权的标准的制度设计包含三项基本属性 ;界定清晰 ;可执行性 ;让与性。由于传统的集权管理的影响 ,供水设施的私有化尚遥遥无期。私有化不触及现存法制结构的根本内容 ,而政府又企求以有限的私有化建立水市场 ,这是政府的矛盾选择。政策调整的方向应当是实现水权的私有化。 Mexico is a country that lacks water resources. Before the 1990s there were three core policies:(1)increasing government's investment;(2)improving water project technology;(3)enhancing social consciousness of concerning water resource protection.But after the 1990s adjustment of water policy is based on this kind of ideoligy: as to the natural resource of water, the standerd system design of property right should include three basic attributes: clearly defined,enforcable and transferable.Because of the influences of traditional management of centralization of state power, privatization of the water supplying establishment is just beginning.Privatization gives no impact on fundamental contents of existing legal system, but the government desires to establish water market by limited privatization, this is a paradoxical selection for the government. The direction of policy adjustment is to realize privatization of water rights,on the basis of which water market could really be established.
作者 魏衍亮
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《干旱区资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 2001年第3期93-96,共4页 Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
关键词 集权控制 水权 私有化 水市场 水利设施 墨西哥 水政策 水利资源 power-centralized control, water right, establishment of water privatization, water market
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[1]Biswas A K. Water Resources Management Series National W ater Master Plans For Developing counteries[M]. Oxford Uni.Press.1997,7.
  • 2[2]Terry L A. Continental Water Marketing[M].Feaser Institute,1994,119.

同被引文献26

  • 1郭普东.论我国水环境与水资源行政管理体制的改革[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2009(1):130-132. 被引量:2
  • 2周刚炎.以色列水资源管理实践及启示[J].水利水电快报,2007,28(5):9-13. 被引量:8
  • 3靖娟,褚俊英,王建华,秦大庸,佘骏.澳大利亚节水与水资源管理的经验与启示[J].人民黄河,2007,29(4):11-12. 被引量:9
  • 4Stanfano L D. International Initiatives For Water Policy Assess- ment: A Review [ J ]. Water Resources Management, 2010,24 ( 11 ) : 2449 - 2466.
  • 5Saleth R M and Dinar A. Water institutional reforms : theory and practice[ J]. Water Policy ,2005 ( 7 ) : 1 - 19.
  • 6麦克·史密斯.澳大利亚水改革动机和框架//王文珂.2000年中澳灌溉水价研讨会论文集[C].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2002:216-223.
  • 7Luan I B. Singapore Water Management Policies and practices [J]. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2010, 26 ( 1 ) : 65 - 80.
  • 8CottetJ,BouffardW.水政策阐释--随着一个新的6年执行计划,法国流域管理机构步上了一个新台阶//尚宏琪,骆向新.第三届黄河国际论坛论文集[C].河南郑州:黄河水利出版社,2007:30-36.
  • 9Tortajada C. Water Management in Singapore [ J ]. Water Re- sources Development,2006,22 (6) :227 - 240.
  • 10World Bank Report. Dealing with Water Scarcity in Singapore:In- stitutions, Strategies, and Enforcement [ EB/OL ]. http ://web. worldbank. org/wbsite/external/countries/eastasiapacificext/ exteapregtopenvironment/0.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部