期刊文献+

黄羊消化道内不同大小食物颗粒的分布 被引量:1

DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD PARTICLES WITH DIFFERENT SIZE IN THE DIGESTIVE TRACT IN MONGOLIAN GAZELLE (PROCAPRA GUTTUROSA)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了黄羊消化道内 7个部位 (瘤胃、网胃、瓣胃、皱胃、小肠、盲肠和直肠 )食物粒径的分布规律。粒径大于 1 0mm的大颗粒食物 ,在瘤、网胃中所占的比例较大 ,分别为 5 7 8%和 3 9 4 1% ,在瓣胃以及瓣胃以下的消化道内容物中所占的比例急剧下降 ,小于 10 % ;而粒径小于 1 0mm的食物颗粒在瓣胃以及瓣胃以下的消化道中所占的比例却显著地增大 ,瓣胃中所占的比例为 88%~ 95 2 %。由于食物营养质量的季节性变化 ,黄羊消化道内食物粒径分布也呈现出明显的季节性变化。 The contents of different parts of the digestive tracts were used to determine the fragmentation process of ingesta in Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa). After measurement of the intact body, operation and necessary measurements, about 150 ml contents were sampled from seven representative parts (rumen, reticulum, omasum, abomasums, small intestine, caecum and rectum) of the digestive tract. The samples were gently washed over a series of sieves with different apertures of 2 0 mm, 1 0 mm, 0 5 mm, 0 25 mm and 0 106 mm in this order by tap water. Washing time was about 25~30 seconds. The relevant particles with different size retained in different sieves, the size of retained particles by 1 0 mm aperture, for example, is between 1 0 mm and 2 0 mm. Retained food particles were taken out, dried at 80℃ for 48 hours by an electric oven, then weighed to the nearest 0 0001 g by an electronic balance. The particle distributions were evaluated by the weight percentages of different particle sizes. The sequence of weight contributions of food particles of different size throughout these parts were of significant difference. The coarsest particles (>2 0 mm) and coarse particles (>1 0 mm) occupied 43 0% and 57 8% in the rumen, and 24 0% and 39 41% in the reticulum respectively, but decreased to be almost negligible at the omasum and thereafter. The proportions of fine and medium sized particles (<1 0 mm) together occupied 88%~95 2% in the omasum and thereafter. It was clear that particle sizes were abruptly reduced from the reticulum to the omasum. The propotion of the coarse particles (>1 0 mm) accounted for less than 12 0% in the omasum and thereafter, and did not change greatly. For the nutritional value of the forage changes in different seasons, the statistics analysis result showed that there also were significant seasonal changes in the fragmentation process of ingesta.
出处 《动物学报》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第5期488-494,共7页 ACTA ZOOLOGICA SINICA
基金 东北林业大学 日本东京大学科技合作项目资助~~
关键词 黄羊 消化道内食物 粒径分布 Mongolian gazelle (Procapra gutturosa) , Digestive tract content, Particle contribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1姜兆文,马逸清,高中信.我国黄羊种群结构及动态趋势的研究[J].兽类学报,1993,13(1):16-20. 被引量:9
  • 2张自学,孙静萍,白韶丽,王忠恩.黄羊(Procapra gutturosa)在中国分布的变迁及其资源持续利用[J].生物多样性,1995,3(2):95-98. 被引量:14
  • 3高中信,金昆,马建章,陈华豪.呼伦贝尔草原黄羊冬季食性的研究[J].兽类学报,1995,15(3):203-208. 被引量:31
  • 4高中信,关东明,金昆,包新康.春季和夏初黄羊的集群行为[J].兽类学报,1996,16(3):176-181. 被引量:14
  • 5高中信,金崑,关东明,包新康,白力军,王克为,群力.黄羊生态研究[J].东北林业大学学报,1996,24(2):37-42. 被引量:11
  • 6[1]Sibly,R.M.Strategies of digestion and defecation.In:“Townsend,C .R.,P.Calow eds.Physiological Ecology.Oxford:Blackwell Scientific Publications,1981.109~139."
  • 7[2]Blaxter,K.L.,N.M.Graham,F.W.Waiman.Some observations on the digestibility of food by sheep,and on related problems.British Journal of Nutrition,1956,10:69~91.
  • 8[3]Faichney,G.J.,D.A.Griffiths.Behavior of solute and particle markers in the stomach of sheep given a concentrate diet.British Journal of Nutrition,1978,40:71~82.
  • 9[4]Faichney,G.J.,J.L.Black.Passage of markers through the gastrointestinal tract of the milk fed lamb.Proceedings of the Australian Physiological and Pharmacological Society,1974,5:67~68.
  • 10[5]Bjornhag,G.,I.Sperber.Transport of various food components through the digestive tract of turkeys,geese and guinea fowl.Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research,1977,7:57~66.

共引文献9

同被引文献30

  • 1王力军,洪美玲,肖向红,马建章.应用骨髓脂肪指数评价狍冬季体状况[J].兽类学报,2004,24(4):353-356. 被引量:4
  • 2马建章,陈化鹏,孙中武,李枫,王槐,李飞,杜永欣,李杰.马鹿和狍饲料植物的营养质量[J].生态学报,1996,16(3):269-275. 被引量:18
  • 3Hofmann R R. 1989. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia, 78:443 - 457.
  • 4Hofmann R R, Saber A S, Pielowski Z, Fruzinski B. 1988. Comparative morphological investigations of forest and field ecotypes of roe deer in Poland. Acta Theriol, 33: 103- 114.
  • 5Holand Q. 1992. Winter digestive strategy of a concentrate selector in Norway: the European roe deer. Can J Zool, 70:1331 - 1335.
  • 6Illius A W, Gordon I J. 1991. Prediction of intake and digestion in ruminants by a model of rumen kinetics integrating animal size and characteristics.J Agric Sci, 116:145 - 157.
  • 7Illius A W, Gordon I J. 1992. Modelling the nutritional ecology of ungulate herbivores: evolution of body size and competitive interactions. Oecologia, 89: 428-434.
  • 8Kennedy P M, Doyle P T. 1993. Particle-size reduction by ruminants-Effects of cell wall composition and structure. In: Segoe R D ed. Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. New York: Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co.,499- 505.
  • 9Koning R, Hofmann R R, Geiger G. 1976. Differentiell-morphologische Untersuchung der resorbierenden Schleimhautoberflache des Pansens beim Rehwild (Capreolus capreolus, Linnaeus 1758) im Sommer und Winter. Z Jagd wiss, 22: 191-196.
  • 10Nagy U G, Regelin W L. 1975. Comparison of digestive organ size of three deer species. J Wildl Manage, 39:621 - 624.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部