期刊文献+

浅谈系统评价的文献偏倚问题 被引量:12

Brief introduction on studies bias of systematic reviews
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文献偏倚是指由于无法全面地获得相关的临床研究资料,从而影响系统评价结果的真实性。常见的文献偏倚主要包括:(1)文献发表偏倚,指某些研究始终不能被发表或被延迟发表;(2)文献查寻偏倚,指系统评价过程中,没有全面地获得已发表的相关文献;(3)文献筛选偏倚,是由于文献筛选不当,错误地剔除了某些有用的文献。文献偏倚评估的常用方法是以各研究的样本量为纵坐标,作用大小为横坐标,绘制漏斗形图。 Literature bias, which can reduce the validity of a systematic review, comes mainly from the fact that all the related studies can not be collected without exception. The following three types of literature bias are most common. (1) Publication bias. The reason is that some studies can not get published, or the publication has been delayed. (2) Literature retrieval bias. This bias is the result that not all published studies are retrieved during the course of systematic review. (3) Literature inclusion bias. While an improper literature selection strategy is adopted, some useful studies are kicked out by error, leading to such bias. A funnel plot (Y-axis is sample size, X-axis effect) is usually useful to assess literature bias in a systematic review.
出处 《中国循证医学》 CSCD 2001年第2期114-116,共3页
关键词 循证医学 系统评价 文献偏倚 临床研究 Evidence-based medicine systematic review literature bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Egger M, Smith GD. Bias in location -and selection of studies[J]. BMJ 1998,316(7124) :61 - 66.
  • 2卢杨,邱明才,屈会起.临床工作者进行循证医学研究的方法学探讨[J].中国危重病急救医学,2001,13(3):134-136. 被引量:20
  • 3Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, et al. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test[J] .BMJ 1997 ;315(7109) :629- 634.

二级参考文献3

共引文献19

同被引文献186

引证文献12

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部