期刊文献+

下颌骨髁突骨折手术与非手术治疗的对比研究 被引量:10

Anatomical and Functional Studies on Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Process Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :比较髁突骨折手术治疗和非手术治疗的疗效。方法 :49例下颌骨髁突骨折患者 ,2 2例采用手术治疗 ,2 7例采用非手术治疗 ;治疗后 6周和 1年复诊 (6周失访率为 14 3% ,1年失访率为 30 6 % ) ,通过临床和X线片检查来测定两组患者的髁突移位角度和张口度 ,分析开口偏斜和咀嚼功能情况。结果 :治疗前手术治疗组的髁突平均移位角度显著大于非手术治疗组 ,但治疗后 6周和 1年 ,手术组的髁突移位角度和开口偏斜率显著小于非手术组 ,手术组的咀嚼功能优于非手术组 ;6周时手术组的张口度明显大于非手术组 ,1年后两者相近。结论 :对伴有移位或错位的髁突骨折 。 Objective:This study aim at comparing anatomical and functional recovery from surgical and non_surgical treatment of condylar process fractures. Methods: Totally Forty_nine patients, 22 treated by performing operation, and 27 using non_surgical methods, were included in this study. Displaced angle of condylar, maximal mouth opening, lateral deviation on opening and masticatory function were analyzed using radiological and clinical examinations 6 weeks and 1 year after treatment.Results: Patients treated by surgical method had significantly greater initial displaced angle of condyles than did the group treated non_surgically, but patients treated non_surgically had significantly greater displaced angle of condylar and lateral deviation on opening than did the group treated surgically 6 weeks and 1 year after the therapy finished. Patients treated surgically had significantly greater masticatory function than did the group treated non_surgically 6 weeks and 1 year after treatment. Six weeks later, patients treated surgically had significantly greater maximal mouth opening than did the group treated non_surgically.Conclusion:Surgical treatment may be helpful in anatomical and functional recovery of mandibular condyles for patients with displaced condylar process fractures.\;
出处 《华西口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第5期306-308,共3页 West China Journal of Stomatology
关键词 下颌骨髁突骨折 非手术治疗 外科手术 比较 condylar process fracture surgical treatment non_surgical treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Olson RA, Fonseca RJ , Zeitler DL, et al. Fractures of the man-dible: A review of 580 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1982,40(1):23~32
  • 2[2]Silvennoinen U, Iizuka T, Oikarinen K, et al. Analysis of possible factors leading to problems after nonsurgical treatment of condylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1994,52(6):793~799
  • 3[3]Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1983,41(1):89~98
  • 4[4]Raveh J, Vuillemin T, Ladrach K. Open reduction of the dislocated, fractured condylar process: Indications and surgical procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1989,47(2):120~126
  • 5[5]Ellis E, Palmiera C, Throckmorton G. Further displacement of condylar process fractures after closed treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1999,57(11):1307~1316
  • 6[6]Umstadt HE, Ellers M, Muller H, et al. Functional reconstruction of the TM joint in cases of severely displaced fractures and fracture dislocation. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg,2000,28(1):97~105
  • 7[7]Ellis E, Simon P, Throckmorton G. Occlusal results after open or closed treatment of fractures of the mandibular condylar process. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2000,58(2):260~268
  • 8[8]Palmieri C, Ellis E, Throckmorton G. Mandibular motion after closed and open treatment of unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1999,57(6):764~775

同被引文献66

引证文献10

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部