期刊文献+

基于不同置信度的证据组合规则及应用 被引量:17

Combination Rules of Various Credibility Evidences and Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用一种组合来自不同置信度证据源证据的组合方法 ,对于该类问题 ,使用传统Dempster Shafer理论往往得到与直觉相悖的结果·使用有效因子λ衡量证据源的可靠性 ,并将其起引进信任函数 ,所有的证据经过有效性评估后再进行组合 ,并将该方法用于专家系统 ,实验证明 ,即使是同一个专家 ,由于其擅长不同 ,对于不同问题给出结论的可靠性不同 ,给定方法与传统D S理论相比 ,提高了决策的准确性· Combination rules which fusing multi evidence with various credibility were given. The traditional Dempster Shafer rules often result in wrong conclusion due to the difference of credibility from multi evidence. A new belief function was derived with λ joining in. λ is a parameter of expected credibility change in evidence authority. Evidences are first transferred according to their λ and then are combined. The method was applied to the power network expert. Compared with the traditional D S theory this method improves the decision making accuracy.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第2期123-125,共3页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (69873 0 0 7)
关键词 输电线路故障 电网专家系统 信息融合 DEMPSTER-SHAFER理论 证据 置信度 组合规则 transmjssion line fault power network expert system information fusion Dempster Shafer theory D S, evidence credibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Yager R. Using approximate reasoning to represent default knowledge[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1987,31(1):99-112.
  • 2[2]Dubois D, Prade H. Default reasoning and possibility theory[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1988,35(2):243-257.
  • 3[3]Murphy A, Catherine K. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000,29(1):1-9.
  • 4[4]Murphy A, Robin R. Dempster-Shafer theory for sensor fusion in autonomous mobile robots[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation,1998,14(2):197-206.
  • 5[5]Murphy A, Robin R. Adaptive rule of combination for observations over time[J]. IEEE Piscataway NJ USA, 1996,13(1):125-131.
  • 6[6]Pigeon L,Solaiman B,Toutin T,et al. Dempster-Shafer theory for multi-satellites remotely-sensed observations proceedings of SPIE [J]. SPIE Bellingham WA USA, 2000,4501:228-236.
  • 7[7]Desmarais K, Michel C, Jiming L. Exploring the appli cations of user-expertise assessment for intelligent interfaces[J]. Publ by ACM New, 1993,4(2):1298-1305.
  • 8[8]Golshani F,Cortes-Rello E. Dynamic route planning with u ncertain information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems,1996,9(4):223-232.
  • 9[9]Dencoux J. Thierry analysis of evidence-theoretic decision rules for pattern classification[J]. Pattern Recognition, 1997,30(7):1095-1107.
  • 10[10]Cuzzolin F,Frezza R. Evidential reasoning framework for object tracking[J]. French Blekbug VA, 1999,3840:13-24.

同被引文献114

引证文献17

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部