摘要
文章采用移动与固定式曝气器对曝气塘进行充氧,分析了二者充氧能力的性能差异,指出移动式曝气较固定式曝气投资省、能耗低、效率高、充氧均匀、充分,特别适合于南方水网密布地带使用。
The author used a movable aerator and a fixed aerator to provide DO respectively and analyzed the difference of oxygenation capacity between them.The findings indicate that the mov able aerator boasts more benefits in equipment investment ,energy consumption,efficiency and ad-equate and well-distributed DO than the fixed aerator,so the former especially fits the'water country'of South China.
出处
《苏州城建环保学院学报》
2001年第4期40-42,共3页
Journal of Suzhou Institute of Urban Construction and Environmental Protection
关键词
移动曝气
固定曝气
充氧
废水处理
movable aerator
fixed aerator
oxygenation capacity
