布洛芬混悬液对小儿上呼吸道感染退热效果对比观察

The observation of brufen suspension in the antipyretic effect of children 's acute upper respiratory infection

目的:比较布洛芬混悬液与复方氨基比林注射液的临床疗效。方法:将100例急性上呼吸道感染高热患儿(腋下体温≥39℃)随机分成2组,分别用布洛芬混悬液口服和复方氨基比林注射治疗。结果:2组用药1h退热效果和速度相同,用药2h均能使患儿体温降至接近正常,但布洛芬能维持8h,复方氨基比林从用药6h后体温呈回升趋势。结论:布洛芬混悬液作用快速,维持时间长,使用方便、安全,患儿易于接受。

Objective: To compare the clinical treatment response of the brufen and SM aminopyrine. Method: To select 100 children with fever symptom of acute upper respiratory infection (Temperature of armpit ≥39℃) . The patients are divided into two groups at random. Then give the treatment to them as follows, take brufen suspension orally and have the SM aminopyrine injection. Result: They both have the same effect and speed of defervesceme in an hour. After two hours, brufen suspension can make objects temperature down to normal and continues for 8 hours; while SM aminopyrine only makes it down to low temperature, but after 6 hours, the temperature has the trend of rising. Conclusion: Brufen suspension has many advantages, taking action quickly, keeping the medical effect longer, and being accepted easily by the children for its convenience and security.