期刊文献+

比较3种牙膏对菌斑、牙龈炎的控制效果 被引量:2

Clinical study on the effect of three dentifrices in the control of plaque and gingivitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较 3种国产牙膏在减少菌斑堆积 ,降低龈炎水平方面的临床效果。方法  94名健康战士分为 3组 ,用双盲法评价 3个月后临床效果。采用纳入和排除的评价标准进行基线检查 ,试验对象每日使用分配的牙膏和软毛牙刷早晚刷牙 1次 ,3个月再次检查。结果 中华草本抗菌组 3个月检查龈炎指数均数与菌斑指数均数下降显著 ,与中华中草药牙膏组及中华单氟防蛀牙膏组比有显著统计学差异。中华中草药牙膏组与中华单氟防蛀牙膏组无显著统计学差异。结论 含三氯羟苯醚的中华草本抗菌牙膏在控制菌斑、龈炎方面 ,强于普通配方牙膏 ,而含有中药野菊花。 Objective To compare the effect of three commercially available dentifrices in the control of plaque and gingivitis. Methods The study was a double blind, parallel, controlled clinical trial with a total of ninety four healthy volunteers who were divided into three groups, each group acquired one dentifrice. After the baseline examination, subjects received an oral prophylaxis and were instructed to brush their teeth twice daily for one minute with their assigned dentifrice, and a standard toothbrush. At the end of 12weeks,the subjects were reexamined. Results It indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the triclosan dentifrice group and the herbal based dentifrice group for plaque scores and gingival scores in favor of the former. Significant differences were also observed between the triclosan dentifrice and the conventional fluoride dentifrice. Yet no significant differences between the herbal-based dentifrice group and the conventional fluoride dentifrice group. Conclusion The triclosan dentifrice is effective in the control of plaque and gingivitis than conventional fluoride dentifrice. The herbal-based dentifrice however is no better than the conventional fluoride dentifrice.
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 2001年第6期459-461,共3页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
关键词 牙龈炎 牙膏 临床试验 菌斑 比较 控制 gingivitis dentifrice clinical trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1De Salva S J,Am J Dent,1989年,2卷,185页

同被引文献22

  • 1赵惠敏,杜娈英,何廉波,张贺,荣金奎.青少年齿龈内阿米巴感染与口腔疾病关系分析[J].寄生虫与医学昆虫学报,2006,13(2):121-123. 被引量:9
  • 2吴皓,孙莉.两种药物牙膏对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的控制效果[J].医药论坛杂志,2006,27(13):98-99. 被引量:2
  • 3褚兆苹,戴军,吴淑慧,马志红,徐华洲,曹刚.大学生中不同人群口腔原虫调查[J].河北医科大学学报,2006,27(6):562-564. 被引量:6
  • 4陈宏,丁熙,张秀华,ZHANG W,LI Y,LEE SS.比较五种中草药牙膏对口腔常见菌的抗菌潜力[J].中国微生态学杂志,2007,19(4):351-353. 被引量:8
  • 5Page RC. Current understanding of the aetiology and progression of periodontal disease. Int Dent J, 1986,36(3 ) :153-161.
  • 6Komman KS, LSe H. The role of local factors in the etiology of periodontal diseases. Periodontol 2000,1993,2:83-97.
  • 7Baehni PC, Takeuchi Y. Antiplaque agents in the prevention of biofilmassociated oral diseases. Oral Dis,2003,9( Suppl. 1 ) :23-29.
  • 8Breuer MM, Cosgrove RS. The relationship between gingivitis and plaque levels. J Periodontol,1989,60(4) :172-175.
  • 9Madianos PN, Bobetsis YA, Kinane DF. Generation of inflammatory stimuli: how bacteria set up inflammatory responses in the gingiva. J Clin Periodonto1,2005,32 ( Suppl 6 ) :57-71.
  • 10Persson S, Edlund MB, Claesson R, et al. The formation of hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan by oral bacteria. Oral Mierobiol lmmunol. 1990.5 ( 4 ), 195-201.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部