摘要
目的 :探讨治疗糖尿病肾病 (DN)尿毒症较理想的透析方法。方法 :对 6 2例作血液透析 (HD)和 34例作持续性非卧床腹膜透析 (CAPD)和DN尿毒症患者进行比较 ,观察两组患者透析前后的血液生化指标 ,生存率 ,死亡原因 ,透析后主要并发症。结果 :透析前合并有高血压、心脏肥大 ,冠心病或年龄大于 6 0岁者 ,行CAPD治疗后出现并发症的机会较HD少 (P <0 0 5 )。结论 :透析前合并有高血压 ,心脏肥大 ,冠心病或年龄大于 6
Objective: To asses the effect of different dialysis methods in uremia patients with diabetic nephropathy. Methods: Blood biochemical indexs, survival rate, cause of death and major complication were compared between 63 patients with hemodialysis (HD) and 34 patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) Results: Compared to HD, patients more than 60 years old, with hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, coronary heart diseases before dialysis and receiving CAPD had less complications than that of HD(P<0.01). Conclusion: CAPD is better than HD for uremia patients with diabetic nephropathy who are more than 60 years old, or with hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, or coronary heart diseases before dialysis.
出处
《中国中西医结合肾病杂志》
2001年第8期456-458,共3页
Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Nephrology