1[1]Rush D, Nickerson P, Jeffery J. Protocol biopsy in the management of renal allograft recipients. Curr Opin Nephrol Hyperten,2000,9:615
2[2]Waiser J, Schrieiber M, Budde K et al. Prognostic value of the Baff classification. Transplant Int,2000,13(supl 1) :S106
3[3]Quivoga I, Morris G, Baboo R et al. The new Baff classification of renal transplantat biopsies: a major impact the adequacy of the core taken.Transplantation, 2001,33(1 ): 1154
4[4]Nankivell BJ, Fenton Lee CA, Kuypers DR. Effect of histological damage on long term kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation, 2001,71 (4):515
5[5]Bandha wa P. Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation.Transplantation, 2001,71 (10): 1361
6[6]Primmol S, Shangri GS, Cockfield SM et al. Time dependency of factors affecting renal allograt survival. J Am Soc Nephrol,2000,11: 565
7[7]Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin Rb et al. The Banff 97 working classification of the renal allograft pathology. Kidney, 1999,55:713
8[8]Koo DD, Welsh KI, Mclaren AJ et al. Cadaver versus living donor kidneys:impact of donor factors on antigen induction before transpantation.Kidney Int, 1999,56:1551
9[9]Nicholson ML, Bailey E, Willams S et al. Computerized histomorphometric assessment of protocol renal biopsy specimens for surrogate markers of chronic rejection. Transplantation, 1999,68: 236
10[10]Seron D,Moreso F, Ramon JM et al. Protocol renal allograft biopsy and the design of clinical trials aimed to prevenent or treat chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation, 2000 , 69 :1849
