摘要
目的 :观察湿润烧伤膏 (MEBO)与常规换药方法对外伤性感染后小面积头皮缺损的疗效。方法 :将1997~ 1999年收治的 12例感染性头皮缺损病人随机分为两组 ,即MEBO组与常规换药组 ,各 6例。病人均为院外已行缝合术 ,但发生头皮下感染的病例 ,平均皮肤感染的面积为 6 0± 1 3cm2 ,两组伤情相近。MEBO组按烧伤湿性医疗技术操作规程换药治疗 ,常规换药组按传统换药治疗 ,观察创面愈合时间。结果 :MEBO组愈合时间 ( n±S)为 15 0± 2 2天 ,常规换药组为 2 0 2± 2 6天 ,组间相比有非常显著性差异 (P <0 0 1)结论 :湿润烧伤膏对外伤后感染性小面积头皮缺损有较好疗效。
Objective:To observe the efficacy of MEBO in treating small area scalp defect resulted from traumatic injury and infection. Method: Six patients with small area scalp defect resulted from traumatic injury and infection, were treated with MEBO. The average infection area was 6.0±1.3 cm 2 and another 6 cases of the same disease were treated with conventional method.Results: Wounds treated with MEBO healed in 15.0± 2.2 days, while those treated with conventional method healed in 20.2±2.6 days. The difference between the two methods was very significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: MEBO has very good efficacy in treating small area scalp defect resulted from traumatic injury and infection.
出处
《中国烧伤创疡杂志》
2002年第1期39-40,共2页
The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers
关键词
外伤
头皮感染
MEBO
常规换药
治疗
Traumatic injury
Scalp infection and defect
MEBO
Conventional treatment