期刊文献+

论巴门尼德的“存在” 被引量:7

On the Concept of Being of Parmenides
原文传递
导出
摘要 从“存在”概念的基本语义可以看出 ,“存在”和“不存在”并非单纯的“有”和“没有” ,而是在根本上和判断的“真”与“假”联系在一起的 ,并进一步与可思议和不可思议的思维状态联系在一起。巴门尼德是在真与假的意义上来论述以“存在”为标志的“真理之路”和以“不存在”为标志的“谬误之路”的。在他看来 ,“存在”是对对象之本质真理的断定 ,“不存在”则是相应的否定 ,思维与存在在根本上是同一的。据此可以认为 ,巴门尼德的“存在论”即是真理论 ,残篇 8中对所谓“存在”的四个标志的陈述 。 Being' is a puzzling concept of Parmenides. Based on analysis of the basic meaning of being, the thesis argues that being or non being is not simply 'there to be' or 'there not to be', but is essentially concerned with truth and falsity of judgement, and further connected with conceivability and inconceivability of thinking. Hence, this thesis profoundly expounds fragment 2, 3, and 8, in which Parmenides emphatically discussed the concept of being, and points out that it is according to truth and falsity that Parmenides discussed the true way signaled by being and the false way signaled by non being. Being affirms the truth of the essence of the object, and non being accordingly denies it, so thought and being is essentially the same. On this basis, the thesis argues that ontology is the truth theory and the account of the so called four signs of 'being' in fragment 8 is actually a depict of the essential signs of truth, which defines truth in terms of its universality in time and space respectively.
作者 聂敏里
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期45-52,共8页 Journal of Renmin University of China
关键词 巴门尼德 "是" "不是" 存在 对象 思维 真理论 古希腊 哲学 Parmenides being non being truth falsity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1施泰格缪勒.当代哲学主流[M].北京:商务印书馆,1986,45.
  • 2G. S. Kirk & J. E. Raven. The Presocratic Philosopher[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1957.
  • 3Guthrie. A History of Greek Philosophy(vol.Ⅱ)[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1965.
  • 4海德格尔.形而上学导论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.45.
  • 5苗力田.亚里士多德全集(第一卷)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.
  • 6胡塞尔.欧洲科学危机和超验现象学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1988.81.

共引文献301

同被引文献44

  • 1朱德生.《形上之思》[M].辽宁人民出版社,2000年版.第77页.
  • 2黑格尔.《逻辑学》上卷[M].商务印书馆,1996年版.第7-8页.
  • 3保罗.利科.《哲学主要趋向》[M].商务印书馆,1989年版.第35页.
  • 4邓晓芒.《西方哲学史上的实体主义和非实体主义》[A]..《场与有》,第2辑[C].中国社会科学院出版社,1995年版.第209页.
  • 5王天成,曾东.辩证法的三种形态——意见的逻辑、幻相的逻辑和思辨的逻辑[J].社会科学战线,2007(4):28-33. 被引量:8
  • 6Bostock, David, 1982, "Aristotle on the principles of change in Physics I", in Schofield and Nussbaum( edsl ), Language and Logos, University of Cambridge Press.
  • 7Burnyeat, Myles, 2001, A Map of Metaphysics Zeta, Mathesis Publication.
  • 8Gill, Mary Louise, 2005, "Aristotle' s Metaphysics reconsidered", in Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 ( 3 ).
  • 9Kirk, G.S. ; Raven, J. E. and Schofield, 2007, The Presocratic Philosophers, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Ross, W.D. , 1924, Aristotle's Metaphysics, A Revised Text With Introduction And Commentary, vol. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Oxford University Press.

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部