1Priatna A, Paschal CB. Variable - angle uniform signal excitation (VUSE) for three - dimensional time - of - flight MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1995,5(4) :421-427
2Liu K, Tanttu J, Castren A,et al. Scanning time efficient slinky for non- contrast MRA at low field. Magn Reson Imaging, 1999, 17(5) : 689-698
3Liu K, Lee DH, Rtt BK. Systematic assessment and evaluation of sliding interleaved Ky (SLINKY) acquisition for 3D MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1998, 8(4) : 912-923
4Mathews VP, Ulmer JL, White ML, et al. Depiction of intracranial vessels with MRA: utility of magnetization transfer saturation and gadolinium. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1999, 23(4) : 597-602
5Chakeres SW, Schmalbrock P, Brogan M, et al. Normal venous anatomy of the brain: demonstration with gadopentetate dimeglumine in enhanced 2 D MR angiography. AJR, 1989, 153(3): 755-760
6Stevenson J, Knopp EA, Litt AW.MR - RAGE Subtraction Venography: A New Technique. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1995, 5 (2) : 239-241
7Krabbe - Hartkamp MJ, van -der - Grond J, de - Leeuw FE, et al. Circle of Willis : Morphologic variation on three - dimensionaltime - of - flight MR angiograms. Radiology, 1998,207(1) : 103-111
8Patrux B, Laissy JP, Jouini S, et al. MR angiography of the circle of Willis: A prospective comparison with conventional angiography in 54 subjects. Neuroradiology, 1994, 36(3) : 193-197
9Oelerich M, Lentschig MG, Zunker P, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion : Comparison of 3D time - of - flight and 3D phase - contrast MR angiography. Neuroradiology, 1998, 40(9) :567-573
10Auffray- Calvier E, Desal HA, Viarouge MP, et al. The evaluation of 3DFT time - of - flight MR angiography versus angiography in the study of carotid atheromatous lesions with a review of the literature. J Neuroradiol, 1995,22(4):272-287
