摘要
利用唐山近场强震记录对如何分析场地反应进行研究 ,分析比较了多种方法 :线性反演法、传统的谱比法以及接收函数法 .通过比较研究 ,发现各种方法都能给出土层场地的卓越周期 ,但每种方法给出的场地反应不完全相同 .其中 ,传统的谱比法与线性反演法的结果较为接近 ,而接收函数法的结果则同其它两种方法的结果相差较大 .在线性反演法中 ,给出了 S波的品质因子 QS,QS在 0 .5～ 32 Hz范围内与频率有关 :QS(f) =67f1 .
A seismic observation array for strong motions was deployed to estimate seismic source, propagation path and local site effects in Tangshan, China. We compared site response from the S-wave inversion and those from other tech-niques, such as traditional direct spectral ratios of S waves and receiver-function of S waves. From the inversion, we found that S-wave quality factor, i.e. QS-value, is approximately satisfied with the relation of QS=67f 1.1 in the range of frequency from 0.5 Hz to 32 Hz and that the source spectra follow the w-2 model of seismic source for low fre-quencies less than about 12 Hz. From the comparison of site responses estimated by the different methods for each soil site, we found that all the methods can extract the same predominant peaks from the responses, the amplifications from direct S-wave spectral ratios are well correlated with those from the S-wave inversion within a factor of 2 to 3, while the correlation between the amplifications from S-wave receiver-function and those from the S-wave inversion is not good, especially for high frequencies more than 8 Hz.
出处
《地震学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2001年第6期604-614,共11页
Acta Seismologica Sinica
基金
中日强震观测国际合作项目资助
关键词
场地反应
S波线性反演
谱比
接收函数
品质因子
地震动
site effects
a linear inversion of S-wave
traditional direct spectral ratio
receiver-function
quality factor
