期刊文献+

联合测定血清CEA、TSGF、sIL-2R对结直肠癌术后再发诊断的临床应用 被引量:4

The Value of Dynamic and Combined Assay of CEA,TSGF and sIL-2R in Predicting Recurrence of Colorectal Cancers after Curative Resection
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文目的是探讨CEA、TSGF、sIL 2R动态及联合测定对结直肠癌术后再发诊断的价值。分别用放免法、生化比色法、ELISA法对 73例结直肠癌根治术后患者进行每 3~ 6月的系统监测 ,随方中位数为 2 7个月 (6~ 5 2个月 )。另有 5 8例再发的患者作为联合检测的研究对象。结果 :(1) 73例术后患者在随访期复发者 15例 ,其中CEA6人 ,TSGF 9人 ,sIL 2R 6人在确诊前 1~ 6月已开始增高 ,另分别有 2人 ,2人和 3人于确诊时也增高 ;(2 )上述标志物两项或三项的联合测定则明显提高对肝外再发诊断的敏感性。而系统的动态监测则大大降低由于其他疾病引起偶尔增高的假阳性率 ,提高了诊断的特异性。故CEA、TSGF及sIL 2R动态和联合测定能较早的发现结直肠癌的再发 ,并能提高其敏感性及特异性。 To evaluate the value of dynamic and combined assay of CEA,TSGF and sIL-2R in predicting the recurrence of colorectal cancers following curative resection,the serum levels of CEA,TSGF and sIL-2R were determined by radioimmumoassay,colorimetry and ELISA in 73 post-operative patients every 3~6 months until recurrence,and another 58 patients with recurrence were taken as objects for study in the combined assay. It was found that in these 73 cases,recurrence developed in 15 cased (20.5%),with a medium follow-up times of 27 months (range 6~52 months). In these 15 cases with recurrence,the serum levels of CEA,TSGF and sIL-2R were elevated in 6(40.0%),9(60.0%) and 9(40.0%) cases respectively 1~6 months before diagnosis was made by other means,and another 2(13.3%),2(13.3%) and 3(20.0%) cases showed elevations of these markers during diagnosis. In comparison with CEA alone,the combined assay of CEA with TSGF or sIL-2R,or the combinations of these three markers obviously enhanced the sensitivity to predict recurrence,and the prospective dynamic assay increased its specificity significantly. It concludes that the dynamic and combined assay of CEA,TSGF and sIL-2R might be valuable for the early detection of recurrence in post-operative colorectal cancers.
出处 《上海免疫学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2001年第6期357-359,共3页 Shanghai Journal of Immunology
关键词 结直肠癌 术后再发 CEA TSGF SIL-2R 结肠癌 肠肿瘤 post-operative colorectal cancer recurrence CEA TSGF sIL-2R
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1Luis A C,Dis Colon Rectum,1999年,42卷,921页

同被引文献35

  • 1刘争春,王福庆,葛海良.趋化因子与肿瘤转移[J].现代免疫学,2008,28(4):339-343. 被引量:1
  • 2康马飞,蒋河君,王世坤,唐名杰,蔡定贤.恶性肿瘤相关物质群的测定及其临床应用价值[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2004,11(4):392-394. 被引量:5
  • 3邱佳信,唐莱娣,杨金坤,沈克平,郑坚.健脾补肾中药对肿瘤成因多阶段学说中起始和启动的影响[J].中国医药学报,1993,8(5):16-19. 被引量:59
  • 4周道银,薛成军,王学,俞靖龙.常规细胞形态学检查对良、恶性浆膜腔积液的鉴别诊断价值[J].临床检验杂志,2007,25(4):285-285. 被引量:13
  • 5颜春洪 韩锐.抗恶性肿瘤转移药研究进展[A].见曹世龙主编.肿瘤学新理论与新技术 第1版[C].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1997.462~484.
  • 6Engstron P F,Meyskens F L. Cancer Prevention. In: Hoskins W J, Perez C A, Young R C, eds, Principles and Practice of gynecologic onclogy 2 nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publisher, 1997,197.
  • 7Leto G, Tumminello FM, Crescimanno M, et al. Cathepsin D expression levels in nongynecological solid tumors: clinical and therapeutic implications [ J ]. Clin Exp Metastasis,2004,21 ( 2 ) :91-106.
  • 8Szajda SD, Snarska J, Jankowska A, et al. Cathepsin D and careino-embryonie antigen in serum, urine and tissues of colon adenocarcinoma patients[J]. Hepato- gastroenterology ,2008,55 ( 82-83 ) :388-393.
  • 9Harris L, Fritsche H, Mennel R,et al. American so- ciety of clinical oncology 2007 update of recommenda- tions for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 (33) : 5287-5321.
  • 10Wagstaff L, Kelwick R, Decock J, et al. The roles of ADAMTS metalloproteinases in tumorigenesis and metastasis [ J ]. Front Biosci ( Landmark Ed) ,2011, 16 : 1861-1872.

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部