摘要
目前有关对物理—事理—人理方法论 (WSR)的研究日益引起人们的重视 ,但对于WSR重点面对的对象的定位 ,物理、事理、人理三个基本概念的内涵和外延 ,以及 WSR的逻辑步骤等问题人们在认识上存在偏差 ,本文根据现有的一些关于物理—事理—人理方法论(WSR)的研究状况 ,在比较和理解的前提下对其相关的概念及运用程序问题进行了探讨 ,指出作为方法论 ,WSR应面向复杂。同时认为 ,对物理、事理、人理三个概念的内涵有必要明确限制 ,外延要认真厘定 ,文章给出一种基于这种观点的一组定义。最后 ,对 WSR的步骤问题与 Checkland的软运筹步骤作了比较分析 ,并进而提出了对 WSR步骤一些新的不同的认识。
The researches about Shli,Wuli,Renli(WSR) has drawn more and more people's attentions recent years.It can be seen that there exerts some different understandings on the fields WSR focused,the connotations and extensions of Shli,Wuli,Renli,and its methods. Based on the temporary studies on WSR, some discussions about the above points have been carried out in this paper. As a methodology, it should be better to face to complexity, as three basic concepts of WSR, the connotations and extensions of Shli,Wuli,Renli should be more carefully defined. Finally, by compared with the steps of Checkland's Soft System Engineering(SSE), some different understandings about the applying steps of WSR are discussed.
出处
《系统工程》
CSCD
北大核心
2001年第6期1-8,共8页
Systems Engineering
基金
国家自然科学基金重点资助项目 ( 79931 0 0 0 )