期刊文献+

Oswestry功能障碍指数评定腰痛患者的可信性 被引量:556

Reliability of the Modified Oswestry Disability Index for evaluating patients with low back pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨Oswestry功能障碍指数 (OswestrydisabilityIndex ,ODI)应用于腰痛患者评定的可信性。 方法 :住院拟手术的腰痛患者 2 2例 (男 13,女 9例 ) ,分为同一检查者重复评定 (A组 ) :10例 ,平均年龄 4 7 7岁 ;不同检查者重复评定 (B组 ) ,12例 ,平均年龄 36 6岁。用ODI对所有对象重复评定 ,平均间隔 3 0d。对两组患者的障碍指数进行Pearson相关分析。结果 :两组重复测试ODI的相关系数分别为 0 95 3和 0 912 ,相关性非常显著 (A组 :t =8 85 1,P <0 0 0 1;B组 :t=7 0 0 8,P <0 .0 1)。结论 :用ODI评定腰痛是稳定、可靠的 ,可作为腰痛患者是否需要手术或康复疗效评定的参考指标。 Objective:To determined the reliability of the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI) for evaluating patients with low back pain.Method:22(female 9,male 13) subjects who were inpatients of the orthopedic words were evaluated using the modified ODI in Chinese before operation.They were divided into two groups:intrarater reliability group(n=10) and interrater reliability group(n=12).The patients answered the ODI.The test retest reliability was done in every 3 days and compared using a Pearson Correlation,individually.Result:The highly correlated coefficient of 0 953( t=8 851,P <0 001) and 0 912( t=7 008,P <0 01)were obtained in intrarater reliability group and interrater reliability group individually.Conclusion:The modified ODI in Chinese shows the superior reliability.This assessment method allows the evaluation of multiple parameters of the patient′s function. It can be used to study the clinical outcome of postoperation or rehabilitation in patients with low back pain.
机构地区 解放军
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 2002年第1期13-15,共3页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 腰痛 功能障碍指数 ODI评定 疗效 手术疗法 康复疗法 Low back pain Evaluation Disability index
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1张年春,周军海,梅芳瑞.腰椎间盘突出症的手术和非手术治疗94例对比研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):41-43. 被引量:29
  • 2杨连发,李子荣,岳德波,张念非,吴宇光.腰椎间盘突出症手术疗效预测因素[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2000,10(1):18-22. 被引量:59
  • 3Deyo RA,Battie M,Beurskens AJ,et al.Outcome measures for low back pain research:a proposal for standardized use[J].Spine,1998,23:2003-2013.
  • 4Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25:2940-2953.
  • 5Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ.A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability Scale[J].Phys Ther,2001,81:776-788.
  • 6Fairbank JC,Couper J,Davies JB,et al.The oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy,1980,66:271-273.
  • 7Schoppink LE,Van Tulder MW,Koes BW,et al.Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the quebec back pain disability scale[J].Phys Ther,1996,76:268-275.
  • 8Kopec JA,Esdaile JM,Abrahamowicz M,et al.The quebec back pain disability scale:measurement properties[J].Spine,1995,20:341-352.
  • 9Triano JJ,McGregor M,Hondras MA,et al.Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain[J].Spine,1995,20:948-955.

二级参考文献15

  • 1汤华丰,丁鑫昌.髓核化学溶解(胶原酶)治疗腰椎间盘突出症30例近期随访报告[J].中华骨科杂志,1989,9(2):88-90. 被引量:71
  • 2[1]Fritsch EW,Heisel J,Rupp S.The failed back surgery syndrom reasons,intraoperative findings and long-term results:A report of 182 operative treatments.Spine[J],1996,21(5):626-633.
  • 3[2]Saal JA.Natural history and nonoperative treatment of lumbar disc herniation[J].Spine,1996,21(24s):2s-9s.
  • 4[3]Herron LD,Turner JA,Novell LA,et al.Patient selection for lumbar discectomy with a revised objective rating system[J].Clin Orthop,1996,325:148-155.
  • 5[4]Hasenbring M,Mariefeld G,Kuhlendahl D,et al.Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients:A prospective investigation of biologic,psychologic and social predictors of therapy outcome[J].Spine,1994,19(24):2759-2765.
  • 6[5]Spengler DM,Ouellette EA,Batie E,et al.Elective discectomy for herniation of a lumbar disc[J].J Bone Joint Surg,1990,72A(2):230-237.
  • 7[6]Junge A,Dvorak J,Ahrens S.Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar disc surgery:A prospective clinical study resulting in recommendations for screening to avoid bad outcome[J].Spine,1995,20(4):460-468.
  • 8[7]Abramovitz LD,Neff SR.Lumbar disc surgery:results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorder of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons[J].Neurosurgery,1991,29(2):301-307.
  • 9[8]Dvorak J,Gouchat MH,Valach L.The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation:A 4~17 years,follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects[J].Spine,1988,13(12):1418-1422.
  • 10[9]Carragee EJ,Kim DH.A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation:Correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology[J].Spine,1997,22(14):1650-1660.

共引文献82

同被引文献4575

引证文献556

二级引证文献5155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部