1[1]Bevan M. Matching hearing technolgoy to hearing needs [ J ]. Hear Res, 1997, suppl, 1:32.
2[2]Kirkwood D H. Dispensers in survey take satisfaction in their work, but many fell unappreciated[J]. Hearing Journal, 1999,52: 19.
3[3]Cox R, Hyde M, Gatehouse Stuart, et al. Optimal outcome measures, research proiorities, and international cooperation [ J ]. Ear Hear,2000, suppl,21:206.
4[4]Weinstein BE. Outcome measures in the hearing and fitting/selection process[J]. Trends in Amplification, 1997,2:117.
5[5]Abrams H. Outcome measures: In health care today, you can't afford not to do them[J]. Hearing Journal,2001,54:10.
6[6]Cox RM, Alexander GC. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: The SADL sale[J]. Ear and Hearing, 1999,20:306.
7[7]Kricos PB. The influence of nonaudiological variables on audiolgoical rehabilitation outcomes[J]. Ear Hear,2000, suppl.21:7.
7[3]Dillon H,James A,Ginis J.Client Odented Scale of Improvement(COSI)and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids.J Am Acad Audiol,1997,8:27-43.
9[5]Stephens D.The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids(IOI-HA)and its relationship to the Clientoriented Scale of Improvement(COSI).Int J Audiol,2002,41:42-47.
