期刊文献+

以航天员为本的思想设计载人航天系统(英文)

Astronaut-centered Philosophy for Designing Manned Space System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文提出一种载人航天系统的新型设计思想 ,即以航天员为本的设计思想。文章首先论述了什么是以人为本的设计思想 ,指出以人为本的设计思想就是在系统设计中将人的作用作为设计的根本、中心和依据。以往的系统设计都是用以技术为本的设计思想 ,但实践证明以技术为本的设计思想存在严重问题 ,导致一系列重大事故 ,因而为以人为本的设计思想所取代。文章介绍了国际民航组织发表的以人为本的自动化的 1 0条设计原则 ,另外又介绍了美国航空航天局约翰逊航天中心的人适合性要求。但前者不适合载人航天系统 ,而后者又没有明确以人为本的设计原则 ,因此文章根据航天医学工程研究所医工结合的长期实践和人 -机 -环境系统工程的理论 ,提出一套以航天员为本的设计要求。该设计要求共分 4大类 ,即对载人航天系统设计的总要求、人 -机关系、人 -环关系和人际关系要求。设计要求中特别强调航天员在载人航天系统中始终处于中心位置 ,载人航天系统的设计应从航天员的安全、健康和作用出发 ,应在确保航天员安全、健康和作用的前提下进行载人航天系统的设计。因此应成立一个由航天医学工程方面的专家 ,航天工效学专家和航天员构成的专家组参加载人航天系统的设计、测试和验收 ,并协助飞行控制总指挥完成飞行实施阶段的指? Astronaut centered design philosophy is a new concept suggested by the authors for manned space system design. It stems from human centered design philosophy. Human centered design means that human role is regarded as important basis and foundation for system design. At the begining, the engineers used to adopt technology centered philosophy for designing complex system, but much practice proved that the technology centered design philosophy won ,t work, resulting in lower system safety and performance. So it has been currently replaced by human centered philosophy. As examples, the principles of human centered automation of the International Civil Aviation Organization and NASA JSC ,s Human rating Requirements were introduced. At last, the astronaut centered design philosophy and its requirements were put forward by the authors. These requirements consist of: general requirements, man machine interaction requirements, man environment interaction requirements and interpersonal relationship requirements.
作者 吴国兴 谭莉
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第1期1-5,共5页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
关键词 载人航天系统 系统工程 航天员 系统设计 以人为本 manned space system system engineering astronauts system design
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Billings CE. Human-centered aircraft automation: a concept and guidelines [R]. NASA TM- 103885. Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center. 1991.
  • 2[2]Billings CE. Toward a human-centered automation philosophy[J]. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1991, 1 (4): 261-270.
  • 3[3]Winograd T,Woods DD. The challenge of human-centered design[R], 1997,http://www. ifp.uiuc.edu / nsfhcs / bog_reports / bog3. html.
  • 4[4]International Civil Aviation Organization, Human factors in CNS/ATM systems[R]. ICAO Human Factors Digest No.11, CIRCULAR 249-AN/149, 1994 .
  • 5[5]NASA Langley Research Center, Human Factors Course - Automation, 2001,http:// chem.larc. nasa. Gov / humanfactors/.
  • 6[6]Price HE. Conceptual system design and the human role[M].MANPRINT. Booher, HR (ed.). New York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1990.161-203.
  • 7[7]The National Plan for Civil Aviation Human Factors - An initiative for research and application[R]. FAA, NASA, DoD 1995,http:// www. hf. faa. gov / docs / national-plan-ex-sum. htm.
  • 8[8]National Science Foundation Workshop on Human-centered Systems: Information, interactivity, and intelligence - final report[R]. 1997, http:// www. Ifp. uiuc. edu / nsfhcs / final-report / toc. Html.
  • 9[9]Palmer MT,Rogers WH,Press HN,et al.A crew-centered flight deck design philosophy for high-speed civil transport aircraft[R]. NASA TM-109171, Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center, 1995.
  • 10[10]NASA Johnson Space Center, Human-rating requirements[R]. JSC-28354, 1998.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部