期刊文献+

三种加压呼吸水平下不同胸部对抗压时的心血管反应 被引量:6

Cardiovascular Responses to G-suits with 3 Levels of Positive Pressure Breathing Using Different Chest Counter Pressures.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨加压呼吸时胸部对抗压对心血管的影响。方法观察 7名 1 8~ 2 0岁健康男性青年穿两种背心抗荷裤 ,在 30、5 0、70mmHg 3种加压水平 ,持续 3min加压呼吸的心血管反应。 结果所有被试者均完成试验。在加压值为 5 0、70mmHg持续 3min时 ,与各自对照组比 ,HR、MAP及TPR明显提高 ,SV明显降低 ,Q Z间期在各加压值加压呼吸时无明显变化。两种装备在 70mmHg加压呼吸时ΔSV、ΔTPR有显著性差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。结论使用这两种装备进行加压呼吸均可造成MAP、TPR和HR明显增加 ,SV明显减少。加压呼吸对心肌收缩功能并无影响。在加压呼吸条件下 ,胸部对抗压与面罩腔内压力相等 。 Objective To observe cardiovascular responses to positive pressure breathing (PPB) using different counter pressures. Method Cardiovascular responses of 7 male healthy subjects (aged 18~20 years ) wearing two kinds of Jerkin G suit were observed under three levels of ground level PPB(30,50,70 mmHg) for 3 min. Result All subjects completed the experiment successfully .While during PPB at 50?70 mmHg levels within 3 min, HR,MAP,TPR elevated significantly, while SV declined significantly. At all 3 PPB levels Q Z time was not significantly changed. There were significant difference (P<0.05) between ΔSV and ΔTPR with the two Jerkin G suits under PPB of 70 mmHg. Conclusion PPB resulted in elevation of MAP,TPR,HR and decline of SV significantly using two kinds of Jerkin G suit . PPB had no effect on contractile function of cardiac muscle .Under PPB, SV increased significantly when chest counter pressure was equal to the mask pressure.
机构地区 航空医学研究所
出处 《航天医学与医学工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2002年第1期36-39,共4页 Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
关键词 加压呼吸 心血管反应 胸部对抗压 背心抗荷裤 positive pressure breathing cardiovascular responses chest counter pressures Jerkin G suit
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献6

同被引文献78

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部