4Mettler L,Volckers S,Bidzinski M.Nuclear grading of endometrial cancer harbors heterogeneous prognostic groups as detected by proliferation activity[J].Eur J Gynecol Oncol,2000,21:475-8.
5Alameda F, Serrano S, Peiro R, et al. Grade of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2001, 25: 1556.
6Lax SF, Kurman RJ, Pizer ES, et al. Reply[J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2001, 25: 1556.
7Scholten AN, Smit VT, Beerman H, et al. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2004, 100: 764-72.
8Sagae S, Saito T, Satoh M, et al. The reproducibility of a binary tumor grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma, compared with FIGO system and nuclear grading[J]. Oncology, 2004, 67: 344-50.
9Jones Ⅲ HW. The importance of grading in endometrial cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1999, 74:1-2.
10Prat J. Prognostic parameters of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Hum Pathol, 2004, 35: 649-62.