期刊文献+

一种新型颈前路钢板的三维稳定性生物力学评价 被引量:4

CERVICAL SPINE BUTTERFLY PLATE FOR UNSTABLE CERVICAL SPINE:A BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION IN VITRO
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对利用颈前路蝶型钢板(CSBP)进行固定的颈椎标本进行三维稳定性分析,进而对颈前路蝶型钢板(CSBP)作出生物力学评价。方法:14具颈椎标本随机分为A、B两组,测量两组正常颈椎在2.0Nm载荷下的运动范围(ROM);将两组颈椎制作成三柱不稳定模型,分别以CS-BP和Orion钢板固定。测量两组颈椎的ROM。结果:CSBP和Orion钢板均能显著降低颈椎各方向上的ROM(P<0.05),在前屈、后伸方向最大。应用CSBP钢板,前屈、后伸ROM较正常颈椎分别降低66%、60%;应用Orion钢板分别降低72%、71%;两种钢板在重建颈椎稳定程度上无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:CSBP的生物力学稳定作用较好。 Objective:To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a cervical spine butterfly plate(CSBP)for unstable cervical spine.Method:Fourteen cervical spine specimens(C3~T1)were divided into two group:A and B.All intact,specimens were subjected to nondestructive testing in6loading modalities on a universal testing machine.A cadaveric model of complete C5~C6instability was produced in both groups.Specimens in group A were stabi -lized with CSBPs,and group B with Orion plates.The nondestructive testing was repeated to determine structural stability.Results:The injured spines stabilized with implants in both groups were significantly more stable than the intact specimens in all modes of testing(P<0.05).Stability of injured spines was increased most in flexion-extension,66%in flexion and60%in extension by CSBP while72%in flexion and71%in extension by Orion plate.The two constructs provided similar stability in6loading modalities(P>0.05).Conclusion:This study shows that CSBP provides biomechanical stability for unstable cervical spine.
出处 《医用生物力学》 EI CAS CSCD 2001年第4期219-221,共3页 Journal of Medical Biomechanics
基金 广东省科委基金项目(99M00210G)
关键词 颈椎 内固定 生物力学 颈前路钢板 稳定性 Cervical spine,Internal fixation,Biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献2

共引文献114

同被引文献37

  • 1张美超,史风雷,赵卫东,欧阳钧,钟世镇.髋关节外展不同角度股骨颈应力分布的有限元分析[J].第一军医大学学报,2005,25(10):1244-1246. 被引量:23
  • 2钟世镇.医用生物力学参数的数字化与数字医学[J].医用生物力学,2006,21(3):169-171. 被引量:6
  • 3刘耀升,陈其昕,廖胜辉,余世策,吴浩波,唐小君.椎间盘高度降低及退变对腰椎生物力学影响的有限元分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(5):566-570. 被引量:16
  • 4欧阳林,周水添,肖玉辉,林焕斌,陈晓武.腰椎退行性病变CT分型(附1180例分析)[J].实用放射学杂志,2007,23(8):1074-1076. 被引量:9
  • 5Merz B, Niederer P, Muller R, et al. Automated finite ele- ment analysis of excised human femora based on preci- sion-QCT [J]. J Biomech Eng, 1996, 118(3) : 387-390.
  • 6Marom SA, Linden MJ. Computer aided stress analysis of long bones utilizing computed tomography [ J ]. J Bio- mech, 1990, 23(5): 399-404.
  • 7OReilly MA, Whyne CM. Comparison of computed tomo- graphy based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh- morphing algorithm [J]. Spine, 2008, 33 (17) : 1876-1881.
  • 8Schmidt H, Heuer F, Drumm J, et aL Application of a cali- bration method provides more realistic results for a finite el- ement model of a lumbar spinal segment [ J ]. Clin Bio- mech, 2007, 22(4) : 377-384.
  • 9Yosibash Z, Padan R, Joskowicz L, et aL A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal fe- mur compared to in-vitro experiments [ J ]. J Biomech Eng, 2007, 129(3) : 297-309.
  • 10Peng L, Bai J, Zeng X, et al. Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions [ J ]. Med Eng Phys, :2006, 28(3) : :22?-233.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部