期刊文献+

藏书发展模式的选择:拥有还是存取? 被引量:50

The Choice of Collection Development Pattern:Ownership or Access
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨了“拥有”与“存取”问题的由来 ,论述了“存取”不能取代“拥有”的理由 ,认为图书馆在制定藏书发展政策时 ,应该根据各自的性质、任务、读者需求、资料类型及经济情况等因素 ,处理好“拥有”与“存取” This paper discusses the origin of issue ownershp or access,and holds that ownership can not he replaced by access.The libraries should deal properly with the relation between ownership and access in collection development policy according to their character,mission,users requirement,materials variety and economic condition.
作者 肖希明
出处 《图书馆论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2002年第1期56-59,共4页 Library Tribune
关键词 藏书发展政策 “拥有” “存取” 图书馆 藏书发展模式 资源共建共享 collection development:ownership and access
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献57

  • 1赵世良.图书馆藏书的复选[J].图书馆建设,1980(4):14-18. 被引量:3
  • 2边恩莲.也谈虚拟图书馆不能取代传统图书馆[J].大学图书情报学刊,1998,16(4):1-2. 被引量:8
  • 3高校文献资源建设研究课题组.关于我国高等学校文献信息保障体系的研究与建议[J].图书馆学情报学研究报告,1996,(9605):18-18.
  • 4[1]Karen Commings. Access over ownership. Computers in Libraries, 1997,17(4):24~26
  • 5[2]Schafer - J; Thornton - G - A. From ownership to access: reengineering library services. Reference - Librarian, (63) 1999:25~40
  • 6[3]Kingma- B - R. Economic issues in document delivery:access versus ownership and library consortia. Serials Librarian. 1998,34(1/2):203~11
  • 7[4]Payne - V - J; Burke - M - A. A cost effectiveness study of ownership versus access. Serials Librarian. 1997,32(3/4):139~52
  • 8[5]Kane - L - T. Access vs ownership: do we have to make a choice. College and Research Libtraries. 1997,58(1):59~67
  • 9[6]Line - M - B. Access versus ownership: how real an alternative is it? IFLA Journal, 1996,22(1):35~41
  • 10[7]Simpson - D - B. Resource sharing = access + ownership: balancing the equaton in an unbalanced world. Journal of Library Administration. 1994,20(1):95~107

共引文献402

同被引文献367

引证文献50

二级引证文献291

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部