期刊文献+

运用Rusitec系统研究不同碳水化合物对麦秸消化率的影响机理 被引量:3

Effect of supplementation with different carbohydrates on straw degradability me asured in a Rusitec system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 试验运用Rusitec系统验证一种假设 ,即添加少量易溶解的碳水化合物能提高瘤胃微生物活性 ,瘤胃微生物细胞死亡和水解后可提供纤维分解细菌所需要的养分。试验采用 4× 4拉丁方设计。 4个处理为基础日粮 (麦秸 +尿素 )、基础 +大豆壳、基础 +淀粉和基础 +果胶。 4个处理的麦秸中性洗涤纤维 (NDF) 4 8h尼龙袋降解率分别为 :基础日粮 5 4 7%、添加大豆壳和果胶的 (5 7 3%和 5 6 2 % )显著高于基础日粮、添加淀粉的变化不大 (5 5 4 % )。大豆壳、淀粉和果胶显著提高麦秸有机物 (OM)总降解率和短链脂肪酸 (SCFA)总产量。但是 ,果胶显著提高而淀粉显著降低乙酸浓度。通过电镜下观察 ,添加果胶导致麦秸上纤维分解菌数量增加 ,而大豆壳导致厌氧性真菌数量增加 ,真菌的活动提高氨氮浓度。通过最大概率记数法 (MPN)测定发酵液的微生物总数和纤维分解菌数量 ,添加大豆壳和果胶显著提高发酵液的微生物总量 ,但不影响纤维分解菌数量 ,添加大豆壳和果胶导致麦秸N降解率低是由于麦秸纤维附着较多的纤维分解菌。因此 。
出处 《山东农业科学》 2002年第1期42-44,共3页 Shandong Agricultural Sciences
基金 山东省自然科学基金委员会资助项目"应用瘤胃模拟技术研究提高瘤胃微生物降解秸秆的利用"的部分内容 项目编号Y97D10 0 69。
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Mould F L,et al.Associative effects of mixed feeds.I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages〔J〕[].Animal Feed Science and Technology.1983
  • 2Stritzler N P,et al.Factors affecting degradation of barley straw in sacco and microbial activity in the rumen of cows fed fibre-rich diets.II: The level of supplemental fishmeal〔J〕[].Animal Feed Science and Technology.1998
  • 3Wang X,et al.The effect of nitrogen source on barley straw degradation in a continuous culture system〔C〕[]..2001
  • 4SAS Institute Inc.Sas, Version 8. 01〔M〕[]..2000

同被引文献18

  • 1蔡顺香.紫外分光光度法快速测定蔬菜中的硝酸盐含量[J].福建农业学报,2005,20(2):125-127. 被引量:26
  • 2[2]Reddy K J,Reddy M R.Effect of feeding complete feeds on various nitrogen fractions and totalVFA concentrations in the rumen fluid of sheep[J].Indian Anim Sci,1985,55(9):819.
  • 3[4]Seal C J,Parker D S.Net absorption of low molecular weight peptides by the mesenteric and portal drained viscera of steers[J].Proceedings of the Nutrition society,1993 (52):190.
  • 4Remond D,Chaise J P,Delval E,et al.Net flux of metabolites across the ruminal wall of sheep fed twice a day with orchardgrass hay[J].J Anim Sci,1993,71(9):2529-2538.
  • 5Sauvant D,Dijstra J,Mertens D.Optimization of ruminal digestion:a modelling approach[A].In:Journet M,GrenetE,FranceMH,Theriez M,Demarquilly C (eds),Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores[C].Paris:Proceedings of the Ⅳth international symposium,1995.143-165.
  • 6Merchen N R,Firkins J L,Berger L L.Effect of intake and forage level on ruminal turn over rates,bacterial protein synthesis and duodenal amino acid flows in sheep[J].J Anim Sci,1986,62(1):216-225.
  • 7Hart S P.Associative effects of sorghum silage and sorghum grain diets[J].J Anim Sci,1987,64(6):1779-1789.
  • 8Vanzant E S,Cochram R C,Jacques K A,et al.Influence of level of supplementation and type of grain in supplements on intake,utilization of harvested,early-growing-season,bluestem-range forage by beef steers[J].J Anim Sci,1990,68:1457-1468.
  • 9McAllan A B,Sutton J D,Beever D E,et al.Rumen fermentation characteristics and duodenal nutrient flow in lactating cows receiving two types of grass silage with two levels of concentrates[J].Anim Feed Sci Tech,1994,46:277-291.
  • 10Preston T R,Leng K A.Matching ruminant production system with available resources in the tropics and sub-tropics[M].Armidale:Penambul Books,1987.

引证文献3

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部