“人类命运共同体”:一种人类正义的新秩序——从“语境主义”化解马克思正义难题引入

“A Community of Shared Future for Mankind”:New Order of Human Justice

"人类命运共同体"的构建内在地要求公平正义。马克思是否追求正义,相关争论形成了"塔克—伍德命题"及其反对派。"塔克—伍德命题"存在着理论症结,尼尔森提出的语境主义是对其的破解。它主张历史唯物主义与正义是兼容的,正义有法权正义与人类正义之分,"人类命运共同体"在本质上追求的是人类正义;马克思的人类意义上的正义、自由与平等内在一致,它们作为整体也都是"人类命运共同体"的应有之义。马克思将自由自觉的活动看作人类的类本质,"人类命运共同体"维护人类整体利益,追求人类的尊严和幸福,是对被遮蔽的人类本质的复归。

To build a Community of Shared Future for Mankind requires justice.Does Marx pursue justice?The related argument formed the "Tucker Wood proposition"and its opposition.There are theoretical cruxes in the "Tucker Wood proposition".Contextual theory is the solution to it.It advocates that historical materialism is compatible with justice.Justice can be divided into legal right and human justice.The essence of the Community of Shared Future for Mankind is human justice.Human justice of Marx is that freedom and equality are internally consistent,which operate as a whole representing the truth of Community of Shared Future for Mankind.Marx regards freedom and conscious activities as the nature of human beings.The Community of Shared Future for Mankind maintains the overall interests of mankind,which is a return to the nature of human beings.