哲学实验方法的合理性论争

Controversies Over Rationality in Philosophical Experiments

"数据无理论为空,理论无数据则盲",实验哲学借用社会科学和认知科学的方法来研究哲学问题,把实验数据与哲学思辨结合起来,产生了许多重要发现,为哲学方法论的发展提供了一条新的思路。在不到20年的发展中,用实验的方法来研究哲学问题几乎遍及哲学的每个领域。然而,人们对哲学中使用实验方法的态度是"高度分化的"。对实验哲学的质疑概括地说有3个问题:实验与哲学可以兼容吗?问卷调查适合研究哲学问题吗?实验方法会排斥分析方法吗?在分别介绍实验哲学的反对者对哲学实验方法质疑的同时,本文结合他人的观点为哲学实验方法进行了辩护。

"Data without theory is empty,and theory without data is blind".Experimental philosophy borrows the methods of social science and cognitive science to study philosophical problems,combines the experimental data and philosophical meditation,so it has produced many important findings,and provided new thought for the development of philosophical methodology.In less than 20 years of development,experimental methods to study philosophical questions have come to pervade every field of philosophy.However,attitudes towards the use of experimental methods in philosophy are "highly differentiated".There are three main questions of experimental philosophy-Is the experiment compatible with philosophy?Is the questionnaire suitable for studying philosophy? Does the experimental method reject the analytical method? While introducing the viewpoints of the opponents of the experimental philosophy questioning the method of philosophical experiment,this paper will defend the philosophical experiment method based on others'viewpoints.