期刊文献+

利奈唑胺治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染的疗效和安全性

Efficacy and safety of linezolid in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究利奈唑胺治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染临床效果和安全性。方法:将78例金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者随机分为对照组和研究组,每组39例,对照组给予万古霉素治疗,研究组给予利奈唑胺治疗。监测两组用药一周后的临床症状、血培养结果,肝肾功能变化、病原学改变及出现的不良反应。结果:研究组总有效率显著高于对照组(100.00%VS 84.62%,P<0.05),不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(15.38%VS 30.77%,P<0.05)。结论:利奈唑胺治疗金黄色葡萄球菌感染疗效显著,安全可靠。 Objective:Evaluation of the clinical efficacyand safety of infection with linezolid in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus. Methods:78patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection were randomly divided into a control group and a study group,with 39patients in each group.Patients in the control group were treated with vancomycin,and the study group was treated with linezolid.Monitor the clinical symptoms,blood culture results,liver and kidney function changes,etiological changes and adverse reactions of patients in the two groups after one week of medication.Results:The total effective rate of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group (100.00%VS 84.62%,P<0.05),and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower than that of the control group (15.38%VS 30.77%,P<0.05).Conclusion:Linezolid is effective and safe in the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in hospitals.
作者 王馥香 Wang Fuxiang(Department of clinical laboratory,First Affiliated .Hospital of Nanyang Medical Col1ege,Nanyang 473000,China)
出处 《北方药学》 2019年第1期154-155,共2页 Journal of North Pharmacy
关键词 利奈唑胺 金黄色葡萄球菌 疗效 安全性 Linezolid Staphylococcus aureus Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献16

  • 1Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance stand- ards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twentieth Informa- tional Supplement, 2010, M100-$20.
  • 2Paulsen IT, Brown MH, Skurray RA. Characterization of the earliest known Stuphylococcus aureus plasmid encoding a multi drugeflux system[J]. J Bacteriol, 1998, 180(13): 3477-9.
  • 3Naber CK. Stuphylococcusuurvus bacteremia= epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management strategies[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009, 48(Suppl 4) : $231-7.
  • 4Laupland KB, Ross T, Uregson DB. Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections= risk factors, outcomes, and the influence of methicillin resistance in Calgary, Canada, 2000-2006[J]. J Infect Dis, 2008, 198(3): 336-43.
  • 5Langsruda S, Sidhua MS, Heirb E, et al. Bacterial disinfectant resistancea challenge for the food industry [J]. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad, 2003, 51(2)= 283.
  • 6Srinivasan A, Dick JD, Perl TM. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococci[J]. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2002, 15(3): 430-8.
  • 7Lambert RJ. Comparative analysis o~ antibiotic and antimicrohial biocides susceptibility data in clinical isolates o{ melhicillin, sensi- tive Stapl~ ylococcus aureus , melhicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa between 1989 and 2000[J]. J Appl Microbiol, 2004, 97(4): 699-711.
  • 8Reverdy ME, Bes M, Brun Y, et al. Evolution of resistance to antibiotics and antiseptics of hospital Staphylococcus aureus strainsisolated Irom 1980 to 1991[J]. Pathol Biol(Paris) 1993, 41(9): 897-904.
  • 9常芳.普外科手术切口感染相关因素调查与干预措施[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2010,20(12):1674-1676. 被引量:68
  • 10唐喜军,肖羡禹,陈松,黄亮,田文芳.65例普外科切口感染因素及其病原菌分布和药敏分析[J].广东医学院学报,2012,30(4):411-412. 被引量:13

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部