联导论证的逻辑透视:从合法性争议到“第三类论证”

The Logical Perspective of Conduction:From the Legitimacy Crisis to “The Third-Type Arguments”

联导论证是不是独立的论证类型及其与"第三类论证"的关系,是非形式逻辑与论辩理论的前沿热点。首先,通过重构近年来联导论证的合法性论战,发现了其合法性的症结所在并提供了新的辩护路径。随后,藉由考察"演绎-归纳"二分法的相关争议,对"第三类论证"这一流行已久的概念提出批评。基于此,联导论证是独立的论证类型。而"第三类论证"这一概念暂时缺乏足够的理据支撑,尤其值得学界重视。

Whether conductive arguments are a distinct type of arguments or not and the relationship between it and"the third-type arguments"are very attractive issues in the community of informal logic and argumentation theories. Firstly,this paper reconstructs the debate about the fundamental legitimacy of conductive arguments. Then,this paper systematically examines the critiques of"deductive-inductive"dichotomization,thereby criticizing the popular term"the third-type arguments". In conclusion,conductive arguments are a distinct type of arguments. And the term"the third-type arguments"is arguably groundless at present.