个人信息的司法救济--以1383份“App越界索权”裁判文书为分析样本

The Judicial Remedy Path of Personal Information Protection:Based on the 1383 Judgments

自然人提起的隐私权纠纷案件数量占信息抓取类案件总量的比例偏低,呈现"侵害规模大、胜诉比例低、诉讼动力不足"的特点。以北京法院1383份"App越界索权"裁判文书作为分析样本,系统展示北京法院个人信息司法救济现状。着重关注《民法总则》颁布后,以隐私权为主的个人信息司法救济模式所面临的实务困境,并从司法实践入手剖析该种模式选择背后的深层原因,明确指出单纯依靠隐私权纠纷进行个人信息救济的不当之处。同时,以侵权责任与违约责任在个人信息保护上的分工协作为逻辑进路,通过法官释明权的合理运用,提出现有法律框架内个人信息纠纷解决机制的合理转换。

In information grabbing cases,the proportion of privacy disputes brought by natural persons is low,which presents the characteristics of large scale of infringement,low winning rate and insufficient motivation.This article takes 1383 Beijing information grasping judgments as the first-hand information,systematically demonstrating the present situation of personal information judicial remedy in Beijing.This article focuses on the predicament of the judicial remedy mode of personal information protection which is mainly based on the privacy disputes after the promulgation of the General Provisions of the Civil Law of China,and analyzes the reasons for the selection of this mode from the judicial practice,and points out that the defects of personal information protection which only relying on right of privacy.At the same time,through the division of the tort liability and liability for breach contract in personal information protection,and the reasonable application of the judge’s interpretation right,this article puts forward the personal information judicial remedy mode in the existing legal framework.