摘要
总结概括了我国主要的三种减排途径:自然支配路径、管理支配路径和市场导向性路径,分析了三种路径的内在关系,得出在碳交易市场完整建立之前,自然支配路径、管理支配路径仍是主要选择。基于数据包络分析(DEA),分别从效果、减排成本两个方面建立模型,对自然支配路径与管理支配路径进行对比研究,将模型运用于我国各省份进行实证研究,并提出政策建议。
This paper summarizes three main ways of emission reduction in China:natural disposability,managerial disposability and market-oriented method,and analyzes the relationship between three kinds of method.It is obtained that natural disposability and managerial disposability method are still the main route choices before the complete formation of carbon trading market.Next,based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),it establishes models to compare natural disposability method and managerial disposability method from the aspects of effect and cost reduction.Finally,models are used in this paper for empirical research in Chinese provinces and give suggestions.
作者
武良鹏
陈晔
徐海燕
WU Liang-peng;CHEN Ye;XU Hai-yan(College of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 211106)
出处
《软科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第12期1-6,共6页
Soft Science
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(71471087)
关键词
减排路径
对比研究
DEA
carbon emission reduction method
comparison study
DEA