期刊文献+

基于预期力不足假说的中国英语学习者统计优选过程研究 被引量:3

A study on Chinese English learners' statistical preemption process based on Reduced Ability to Generate Expectations Hypothesis
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于预期力不足假说,结合二语者预期能力以及英语本族语者显示出的统计优选效应,对中国英语学习者的统计优选(统计替代)现状进行了探索。研究采用可接受度判断任务,以英语专业研究生(硕士组)、英语专业二三年级本科生(本科组)及高二学生(高中组)为实验对象,分析他们对不同句子可接受度的判断结果。研究发现:高中组及本科组学习者存在预期力不足现象,进而影响了统计优选的发生;而硕士组学习者预期力较强,能够利用统计优选过程,整体表现与英语本族语者相似。研究结果在一定条件下支持了预期力不足假说,并推断出统计优选存在通过教学干预进行改善的可能。 Based on Reduced Ability of Generating Expectations (RAGE)Hypothesis,this study explores the current situation of Chinese English learners'statistical preemption process by comparing their ability of generating expectations and the statistical preemption effect shown in native English speakers.The research task is acceptability judgement and the subjects include graduate students, undergraduate students,and senior high school students.The results show that high school students and undergraduate students have a reduced ability of generating expectations which influences statistical preemption process,while graduate students are similar to native speakers.Findings support RAGE Hypothesis on some conditions and imply that statistical preemption can probably be improved by instruction intervention.
作者 孙妙 杨连瑞 SUNMiao;YANG Lianrui(College of Foreign Languages,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China)
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期935-945,961,共12页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1董燕萍,梁君英.走近构式语法[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):142-152. 被引量:175
  • 2哥德堡(A.E.Goldberg)著,吴海波译.2007,《构式:论元结构的构式语法研究》.北京:北京大学出版社.
  • 3哥德堡(A.E.Goldberg)著,吴海波译.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 4Bencini, G. & A. E. Goldberg. 2000. The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 43:640-651.
  • 5Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions: A Constructional Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • 6Goldberg, A. E. 2004. But do we need universal grammar[J]? Cognition 94 : 77-84.
  • 7Goldberg, A. E , Casenhiser, D. & N. Sethuraman. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 14: 289-316.
  • 8Goldberg, A. E, Casenhier, D. & N. Sethuramar. 2005. The role of prediction in construction learning [J]. Journal of Child Language 32: 407- 426.
  • 9Goldberg, A. E, & G. Bencini 2005. Support from language processing for a constructional approach to grammar [A]. In A. Tyler (ed.). Language in Use: Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives on Language and Language Learning [C]. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics.
  • 10董燕萍,梁君英.构式在中国学生英语句子意义理解中的作用[J].外语教学与研究,2004,36(1):42-48. 被引量:79

共引文献44

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部