摘要
《合同法》第286条规定的建设工程价款优先受偿权制度不够明确,尽管《最高人民法院关于建设工程价款优先受偿权问题的批复》进行了补充,但建设工程价款优先受偿权的实现仍然存在诸多疑问。对建设工程价款优先受偿权实现途径的探索,建立在对建设工程价款优先受偿权的法理基础具有充分认识的基础之上。围绕着建设工程价款优先受偿权实现过程中存在的疑难问题,有必要从主体论、对象论、顺位论、原因论、效力论、程序论等角度重述建设工程价款优先受偿权的行使展开研究。
The 286th clause of the contract law that stipulates the system of contractor’s priority right to be repaid is not clear enough. Although the “Supreme People’s Court’s Approval on the Contractor’s Priority Right to Be Repaid ” has made supplementary provisions to the 286th article of the contract law, there are still many doubts about the realization of the priority. The exploration of the way to realize the contractor’s priority right to be repaid is based on the full understanding of its legal basis. Focusing on the difficult problems in the process of realizing the contractor’s priority right to be repaid, it is necessary to study the system of contractor’s priority right to be repaid from the perspectives of subject, object, sequence, cause, effectiveness and procedure.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2018年第3期112-144,共33页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
基金
2015年度北京仲裁委员会科研基金重点项目“工程承包人行使优先受偿权研究”的研究成果
关键词
优先受偿权
建设工程承包人
法定抵押权
法定优先权
建设工程合同
priority right to be repaid
contractor of construction project
statutory mortgage
statutory priority
construction contract